Was Charles Darwin an atheist? Leading Darwin expert and founder of Darwin Online, John van Wyhe, writes,
for very many Victorians the choice was not between God and science, religion or evolution, but between different notions of how God designed nature. It was already widely accepted that fixed natural laws (or secondary laws) had been discovered that explained natural phenomena from astronomy and chemistry to physiology and geology. Darwin, it was believed, had simply discovered a new law of nature designed by God. And it seems this was how Darwin himself viewed at least part of the religious implications of his evolutionary theory. This also makes it all the more understandable that Darwin was buried by the nation in Westminster Abbey in 1882.Darwin himself was not entirely consistent in the language he used to describe his beliefs. And of course his views changed over the course of his life. Starting in 1876 he began writing a private autobiography for his children and grandchildren. In it he mentioned the change in his religious views. A gradual scepticism towards Christianity and the authenticity of the Bible gradually crept over him during the late 1830s – leaving him not a Christian, but no atheist either; rather a sort of theist. To be a ‘theist’ in Darwin’s day was to believe that a supernatural deity had created nature or the universe but did not intervene in the course of history. Darwin used the term in one famous passage in the autobiography:
… "the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man with his capacity of looking far backwards and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist. This conclusion was strong in my mind about the time, as far as I can remember, when I wrote the Origin of Species; and it is since that time that it has very gradually with many fluctuations become weaker."
At other times he used the term ‘agnostic’ – a word coined and made fashionable by the naturalist Thomas Henry Huxley. In an 1879 letter, written around the same time as the autobiography and first published in Life and Letters, he writes:
"In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God. I think that generally (and more and more as I grow older), but not always, that an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind."
Given the paucity of evidence, and the ambiguity of the statements that do remain, we will probably never be able to completely refine our definition or understanding of Darwin’s religious views. But that is not to say that there are some things that cannot be known. One point is abundantly clear, all the surviving evidence contradicts the assertion that Darwin was an atheist.
1 comment:
Interesting post. Its rather presumptuous of us, and probably cannot do justice to a lifetime of intellectual activity to sum up a mans views in a single word such as atheist or agnostic. Clearly Darwin was a complex person whose thoughts fluctuated, which one might take to mean that he was faced with moments of clarity when he was equally convinced that there must be a designer! I think the struggle he went through is common for people today too, who also wrestle with the evidence for a Creator, and the tendency to see all things as having purely natural causes. It seems he was always a skeptic, perhaps even during those fluctuations of seeing God in the design. Unfotunately tho, it seems his final conclusion was unbelief. In my mind the difference is small. However in another regard, the difference matters, and it seems the authors point is more to encourage intellectual discussion, to acknowledge the fact that the question of Gods existence is really still up for debate, as Darwins life acknowledged, the discussion has not been concluded as modern atheists would have us believe. Whether or not God exists is very much still on the table, and subject to real debate, relying on evidence and reason. Tothink atheism was self evidently true in Darwins mind would be way off track.
Post a Comment