Jonathan Turley writes an important piece in The Washington Post about freedom of speech. Here are some excerpts: "The much-misconstrued statement of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes that
free speech does not give you the right to shout fire in a crowded
theater is now being used to curtail speech that might provoke a
violence-prone minority. Our entire society is being treated as a
crowded theater."
"Even the Obama administration supported the passage
of a resolution in the U.N. Human Rights Council to create an
international standard restricting some anti-religious speech (its full
name: “Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping and Stigmatization
of, and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence and Violence Against,
Persons Based on Religion or Belief”). Egypt’s U.N. ambassador heralded
the resolution as exposing the “true nature” of free speech and
recognizing that “freedom of expression has been sometimes misused” to
insult religion."
"Other Western nations routinely bar forms of speech considered hateful.
Britain prohibits any “abusive or insulting words” meant “to stir up
racial hatred.” Canada outlaws “any writing, sign or visible
representation” that “incites hatred against any identifiable group.”
These laws ban speech based not only on its content but on the reaction
of others. Speakers are often called to answer for their divisive or
insulting speech before bodies like the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal."
"Perhaps the most rapidly expanding limitation on speech is found in
anti-discrimination laws. Many Western countries have extended such laws
to public statements deemed insulting or derogatory to any group, race
or gender."
"Government officials have long labeled whistleblowers, reporters and
critics as “liars” who distort their actions or words. If the government
can define what is a lie, it can define what is the truth."
"The very right that laid the foundation for Western civilization is
increasingly viewed as a nuisance, if not a threat. Whether speech is
deemed imflammatory or hateful or discriminatory or simply false,
society is denying speech rights in the name of tolerance, enforcing
mutual respect through categorical censorship.
As in a troubled
marriage, the West seems to be falling out of love with free speech.
Unable to divorce ourselves from this defining right, we take refuge
instead in an awkward and forced silence."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-four-arguments-the-western-world-uses-to-limit-free-speech/2012/10/12/e0573bd4-116d-11e2-a16b-2c110031514a_story.html
via http://profmondo.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/say-the-word-and-youll-be-free/
1 comment:
Because those who could stop this are afraid of the price that simple.
Post a Comment