Hillary Clinton is taking responsibility for the failure to provide adequate security for the ambassador to Libya and his staff. Where is her resignation?
http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/20221016hillary_takes_responsibility_for_sept_11_attack_in_libya
3 comments:
So you're saying that Bush should have resigned when the twin towers were struck? In Romney's words, it must have been his "unraveling foreign policy" that was responsible for those attacks.
My point is that we ought to be careful with this type of argument. It goes both ways.
Ryan,
If Bush was responsible, yes. That is how to show responsibility. Or, he could have fired Condi Rice, who was Bush's National Security Adviser at the time, for not bringing to Bush's attention increased terrorism activity and communications the C.I.A. was picking up. C.I.A. Director George Tenet and his top aide warned Rice in July, 2001 that something was up with al Qaeda. Bob Woodward writes about it in his book State of Denial.
No need to be careful with this type of argument. It should go both ways! Saying "I'm responsible," and then making no changes to right the ship, is hollow. Skillful manipulators like the Clintons and Obama can put that phrase right in their bag of tricks to dupe people and keep their power.
Hilary got something for taking the blame...I want to know what. Well I guess it could have gone the other way she's been blackmailed into taking blame either way trust me she did not take blame just cuz
Post a Comment