There are some clouds over the Arab Spring. Mike Rosen writes in today's Denver Post that the "Obama administration's claim that the
posting of the trailer on YouTube two months ago triggered this latest
eruption of Muslim violence defies credibility. It was no more
spontaneous than the Occupy Wall Street circuses stage-managed by
community organizers and unions across the U.S. last year."
Furthermore, he asserts that "Obama's strategy to win the hearts and minds of radical Islamists doesn't appear to be working."
"Initial enthusiasm over the so-called Arab
Spring — which Obama pretentiously compared to the American Revolution
and the civil rights movement — is increasingly looking like a
delusion. Moderate Muslims, an endangered species, are intimidated and
overwhelmed by intolerant, brutal, irrational theocrats hopelessly
trapped in a 7th century mentality. Obama's Middle East foreign policy
is founded on the premise that you can reason and negotiate with the
likes of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Salafists, Hamas, al-Qaeda, the
Taliban and others who take offense at the very existence of competing
religious faiths and believe the ultimate goal is death to the infidels.
The longer-term casualty of this current
round of Middle East turmoil is Obama's foreign policy credibility.
Recognizing this, the liberal media, wholly committed to his
re-election, have come to his defense, circling their wagons around him.
First, they gullibly (or conveniently) bought into the pretense of the
anti-Muhammad video as the catalyst for the Muslim uprising. And then
they deflected attention from Obama by attacking Romney for what they
characterized as his rash criticism of the administration and the
feckless statement from our Cairo embassy patronizing the "hurt
religious feelings of Muslims," whose habitual response to hurt feelings
is murder.
You'd think an incumbent American president had never
before been criticized by members of the opposition party over foreign
policy. How about Nixon, Reagan and both Bushes?
Imagine if
Americans at our Cairo embassy or Libyan consulate had been taken
prisoner and kept as hostages right before this election. It would have
been Jimmy Carter all over again, as Obama follows in his foreign policy
footsteps."
1 comment:
One would think this would sink "the one." I can't find any effect.
Post a Comment