Saturday, April 23, 2011

What? Obama not keeping his word?

The Washington Post editorializes here about Obama and Syria:
The administration has sat on its hands despite the fact that the Assad regime is one of the most implacable U.S. adversaries in the Middle East. It is Iran’s closest ally; it supplies Iranian weapons to Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip for use against Israel. Since 2003 it has helped thousands of jihadists from across the Arab world travel to Iraq to attack American soldiers. It sought to build a secret nuclear reactor with the help of North Korea and destabilized the pro-Western government of neighboring Lebanon by sponsoring a series of assassinations.


More:
As a moral matter, the stance of the United States is shameful. To stand by passively while hundreds of people seeking freedom are gunned down by their government makes a mockery of the U.S. commitment to human rights. In recent months President Obama has pledged repeatedly that he would support the aspiration of Arabs for greater freedom. In Syria, he has not kept his word.

1 comment:

Terri Wagner said...

Blah Blah Blah. Have you ever noticed that liberals pick their causes? Iraq was bad, Afhanistan was necessary, Vietnam was bad, WWII was glorious. Sometimes I just get irritated with their inconsistency. Isn't all war bad? A failure to communicate? And sometimes tragically none of our business?