Here are some Haught quotes from the interview.
From the beginning of the modern world, science decided quite rightly that it wasn't going to tackle such questions as purpose, value, meaning, importance, God, or even talk about intelligence or subjectivity. It was going to look for purely natural, causal, mechanical explanations of things.
After Darwin, after Einstein -- just as after Galileo and Copernicus -- we can't have the same theological ideas about God as we did before.
Darwin's thought seems to be more important intellectually and culturally than it's ever been. My view is that theology, instead of ignoring or closing its eyes to it, should look it squarely in the face. It has everything to gain and nothing to lose by doing so. In my view, Darwin's thought is a gift to theology.
Why does the universe not stand still? there's a restlessness, a tendency of the cosmos to go beyond itself.
Science is simply not equipped to deal with the dimensions of purposefulness, love, compassion, forgiveness -- all the feelings and experiences that accompanied the early community's belief that Jesus is still alive.
Read the whole thing here.
3 comments:
Assuming evolution is true, it contradicts enough laws of nature that it could not have happened without outside interference.
Funny, Bob, I left the church and God behind when I was much younger, then went back to university to get an engineering degree. While there, I encountered thermodynamics and physics, including Einstein's laws. It was there, while not seeking anything but a decent grade, that I came to a born again experience of God. Amazing experience. And it was years before being born again to Christ.
But the first one happened through science, not in spite of it.
Enjoyed this and also Web's comment !
Merry Christmas to you and all of yours!
Post a Comment