"Lockdowns should be rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument!"

Sundance reports,

Johns Hopkins Study Shows Government Cure for COVID was Worse Than Disease, Lockdown Benefit Provided No Mitigation of Death from Virus

An interesting study from John’s Hopkins University [DATA HERE] shows the 2021 government lockdown did virtually nothing to stem death from the pandemic, but likely created more adverse “social ills” and long-term negative health outcomes.

The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.

“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote. But the research paper said lockdowns did have “devastating effects” on the economy and contributed to numerous social ills.

“They have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, and undermining liberal democracy,” the report said.

“Such a standard benefit-cost calculation leads to a strong conclusion: lockdowns should be rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument,” the paper concluded.

Read more here: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/02/01/johns-hopkins-study-shows-government-cure-for-covid-was-worse-than-disease-lockdown-benefit-provided-no-mitigation-of-death-from-virus/