Daniel Henninger wonders in the Wall Street Journal if maybe it is time to take seriously the candidacy of Herman Cain.
"Put it this way: The GOP nominee is running against the incumbent president. Unlike the incumbent, Herman Cain has at least twice identified the causes of a large failing enterprise, designed goals, achieved them, and by all accounts inspired the people he was supposed to lead. Not least, Mr. Cain's life experience suggests that, unlike the incumbent, he will adjust his ideas to reality."
What do you think? Is there any valid reason not to take a serious look at the Cain candidacy?
1 comment:
I take him seriously and apparently so do others. Is it enough? Beats me. The northeastern RINOs certainly are fighting the conservatives. Who will win? I predict a conservative third party myself.
Post a Comment