According to Denver Post reporter Kevin Vaughn, Ward Churchill explained in court testimony this week that a law "cannot be taken simply at face value, reading the text." With that kind of reasoning, it would appear that he might be a prime candidate for Obama to select to fill the next vacancy on the Supreme Court!
Or, perhaps Churchill can be hired by the New York Times. He was asked by the attorney for the University of Colorado if he disagreed that it was a "deceptive practice to write an article, publish it under someone else's name, and then cite it as a source." "Yes, Churchill testified, "I disagree."
1 comment:
This guy proves the adage you really can be anything you want...even if you do it all wrong.
Post a Comment