America First: European CEOs Go One By One To Tell Trump They Are Investing Billions Back In The USRead more here.
This blog is looking for wisdom, to have and to share. It is also looking for other rare character traits like good humor, courage, and honor. It is not an easy road, because all of us fall short. But God is love, forgiveness and grace. Those who believe in Him and repent of their sins have the promise of His Holy Spirit to guide us and show us the Way.
Thursday, January 25, 2018
Europeans want to invest more in US
Benny Johnson reports at The Daily Caller that
"How to fight for freedom in the Left’s social media gulag"
At Front Page Magazine, Oleg Atbashian, founder of the satirical blog The People's Cube, writes about FACEBOOK-GOOGLE-TWITTER 1984
How to fight for freedom in the Left’s social media gulag.
How to fight for freedom in the Left’s social media gulag.
Just last week I read a story by John Hawkins, How Conservatives Are Being Destroyed by Facebook, Twitter and Google Without Even Realizing It, where the author announced that he'd been forced to shut down his Right Wing News website and explained that in today's social media environment, a conservative's chances to get a political website off the ground are infinitesimal.Read more here.
Then I read a story on The Daily Caller about Google having an actual secret speech police that blocks, demonetizes, and otherwise censors conservative content.
Then I received a screenshot from one of my readers, who is a U.S. Army officer, showing that my People's Cube has been blocked by the DoD Enterprise-Level Protection System - not because of our silly anti-Left humor, but because of "hate and racism" - a blatantly false label, probably transferred from one of the blacklists shared by social media and the government (or at least the Deep State part of it). I've recently written about it in FrontPage Mag.
And just this morning, I received dozens of messages from my readers that Facebook wasn't allowing them to post or share any People's Cube links.
...Throughout history, the human mind has been our main tool of survival. To live, we depend on accurate information about our surroundings. This makes the objective truth a basic human need. Truthful information is as essential to our existence as food, shelter, and clothing. In societies where information is distorted and suppressed by totalitarian governments, people usually die in large numbers.
But information can also be a commercial product, bought and sold at market prices by specialized organizations that have amassed great fortunes in doing so. Good for them. However, as the historian Robert Conquest pointed out, "Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing." And the Left by default is prone to manipulate information in a way that suits its agenda at the expense of the general population.
Leftists in the government are obsessed with regulating all products and services, essential or not. They'd like to regulate information as well - see the Fairness Doctrine and Net Neutrality. Conservatives have always instinctively opposed that trend, guided by the principle, "Whatever the Left does, we must do the opposite." This kneejerk impulse to take the "diametrically opposite position" has often allowed the Left to toy with conservatives and lure them into absurd situations where they fought phantom causes. In part, due to such "diametrical" thinking, the anti-regulation conservatives withdrew themselves from the regulatory process, effectively giving the Left free reign in shaping government regulations.
Enter Donald J. Trump. Right off the bat he introduces what I call "perpendicular thinking," meaning that instead of jumping to the opposite, he goes vaguely perpendicular. This disorients the Left (as well as some anti-Trump "diametrical" conservatives), forcing them to take unpopular and ridiculous positions on the opposite side of his choosing. And while Trump is beating the Left at their own game, keeping them confused and unable to deal with their new role of the "diametrical opposition," we should move in and do some "perpendicular" regulation.
At the same time, the product called "information" is regulated in the exactly opposite fashion. It is being filtered, altered, rejected, or exaggerated according to arbitrary and subjective markers and biases, creating a distorted and fraudulent picture of reality. If a food manufacturer tried to label his products the same way, he would be sued out of existence. Imagine buying fruit juice labeled with 0% sugar instead of the actual 100% and 100% of vitamin C instead of the actual 0%.
This clearly falls into the jurisdiction of the newly reformed Bureau of Consumer Protection, whose stated goal is to stop unfair, deceptive and fraudulent business practices by:
collecting complaints and conducting investigations
suing companies and people that break the law
developing rules to maintain a fair marketplace
educating consumers and businesses about their rights and responsibilities.
Some have proposed to regulate the Internet through the FCC, but that is fraught with equating the web with a public utility, which is subject to government rationing of free speech - a pitfall avoided by the recent repeal of Net Neutrality.
In contrast, the Bureau of Consumer Protection would treat the Internet as a marketplace for commercial products, one of which is information. Instead of regulating free speech, it would protect consumers against fraud.
On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered unconstitutional any restriction of speech based on the so-called "hate speech" allegations, unanimously reaffirming that there is no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment. Justice Anthony Kennedy explains this decision as follows:
A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government's benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.
And yet, the unconstitutional and deceptively named "hate speech" gimmick is being excessively used to suppress conservative and libertarian speech by social media moderators and by algorithms embedded in FacebookGoogleTwitter code. The same gimmick is also being widely used today by speech police in many organizations, including educational and government entities, in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Media giants may beg to differ and remind us of their status as private companies that can make their own internal rules. But if their main product is information, which has an existential value to our society, they can no more hide behind their private status than the landlords or mortgage bankers can.
That means that FacebookGoogleTwitter and other media giants can be forced by law to discard their manipulative "hate speech" and other ideological filters and to allow a free flow of information lest they be sued by the Bureau of Consumer Protection for violating consumer rights. Wikipedia can be sued for its grotesquely biased suppression and misrepresentation of political reality, which creates a very skewed image of the world. For added entertainment value, CNN with its "Facts First" brand campaign can probably also be sued for false advertisement.
Unhinged hateful rhetoric coming from the Left never gets to be branded "hate speech," nor is it ever blocked on social media. This alone makes the "hate speech" label meaningless and exposes the one-sided ideological agenda behind it. Of course, no logical argument will ever convince the leftist agenda-driven "hate speech police" to give up their dominance over the national debate voluntarily. Instead, this unethical practice must be outlawed legislatively, as an unconstitutional impediment to free exchange of information.
If we outlaw the corrupt system of "hate speech" policing, it will do a lot more than just free up the Internet and the rest of the media. It will pull the rug from under various demagogues who profit from the harassment of conservatives. It will clear many honest people of libelous allegations. It will demolish the sordid cottage industry of "hate speech watchers," like the Southern Poverty Law Center, whose fundraising is directly proportional to how many honorable people they can defame as "haters" and who compile dubious blacklists, which are then used as guidance by FacebookGoogleTwitter and the mainstream media to silence or disparage conservative figures.
Social media should certainly continue to block real spam and clickbait sites with fake news (they do exist). The trick is that online reprobates aren't likely to file a complaint and seek government protection from being blocked - unlike legitimate content providers who can and should request an investigation if they are being suppressed. Terrorist messaging can be dealt with by working with law enforcement professionals, not with SPLC and similar amateurs who have a shady agenda.
Before conservatives are erased from the Internet, legal minds in the conservative movement had better select an appropriate case of content suppression and stage an exemplary class action lawsuit that would create a seminal precedent for all future cases. If no legal ground for such a lawsuit exists, we must work with our legislators to create it.
Conservatives who are philosophically opposed to regulation may not like this method, but realistically and objectively, this seems to be the least worst solution to get out of the memory hole designated for us by the leftist media giants.
People on our side should stop pretending that we are not in the middle of an all-out war waged by the Left against conservative media. We won't survive if we continue to react to leftist attacks by lying down and taking positions whose only value is in being diametrically opposite to those of the attackers. It's time we went perpendicular.
Will there be a Constitutional crisis? Trump in Davos, US gymnastic sexual abuse crisis, which sandwich contributes most to global warming?
President Trump is in Davos, Switzerland attending the World Economic Forum. Some protesters hung a huge sign on the side of a mountain saying, "Trump Not Welcome!" Greg observes that Switzerland's biggest problem is being confused for Sweden! He suggests that the Euros take a look at what is happening in America. Our economy is on fire. They could warm their hands!
Dana calls Trump the "head coach of capitalism." Reality has set in and people are starting to realize that he governs very differently than he campaigned.
Jesse notes that it is not trickle down economics, it is more like a flood. Kimberley added, "flash flood!" Jesse: The Democrats are like climate deniers, but they are winning deniers!
Juan says China is doing better than the U.S. Jesse reminds him that the workers in China are getting paid pennies. Juan sarcastically replies, "Oh, so now we're making excuses again!"
Trump indicated to a reporter that he may be meeting under oath with Mueller in the next couple of weeks. Judge Napolitano thinks it would be dangerous for Trump to do that. Alan Dershowitz warns that because Mueller does not have Russian collusion, he may go after obstruction of justice, which would create a constitutional crisis.
Kimberley and Jesse agree that he should not go under oath with Mueller.
The US gymnastics scandal. A culture of not reporting abuse. There needs to be an investigation. Who knew about it and did nothing?
Did John Kerry make traitorous remarks to Abbas? Or is Abbas a liar?
Leftists are now going to be telling us we are contributing to global warming if we have bacon or sausage sandwiches.
Dana calls Trump the "head coach of capitalism." Reality has set in and people are starting to realize that he governs very differently than he campaigned.
Jesse notes that it is not trickle down economics, it is more like a flood. Kimberley added, "flash flood!" Jesse: The Democrats are like climate deniers, but they are winning deniers!
Juan says China is doing better than the U.S. Jesse reminds him that the workers in China are getting paid pennies. Juan sarcastically replies, "Oh, so now we're making excuses again!"
Trump indicated to a reporter that he may be meeting under oath with Mueller in the next couple of weeks. Judge Napolitano thinks it would be dangerous for Trump to do that. Alan Dershowitz warns that because Mueller does not have Russian collusion, he may go after obstruction of justice, which would create a constitutional crisis.
Kimberley and Jesse agree that he should not go under oath with Mueller.
The US gymnastics scandal. A culture of not reporting abuse. There needs to be an investigation. Who knew about it and did nothing?
Did John Kerry make traitorous remarks to Abbas? Or is Abbas a liar?
Leftists are now going to be telling us we are contributing to global warming if we have bacon or sausage sandwiches.
Mueller
Did Robert Mueller, when he was FBI Director, approve of a deception and cover-up regarding the involvement of a Saudi Arabian family living in Florida in terms of their known association with 9-11 terrorists?Tyler O'Neil reports at PJ Media,
New FBI documents released in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) investigation suggest then-FBI Director Robert Mueller was involved in a potential coverup denying that the FBI found connections between a Saudi Arabian family living in Sarasota, Fla., and the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mueller's involvement in this case might cast a pall over his investigation into Donald Trump's alleged connections with Russia.
The case revolves around Abdulaziz al-Hijji, his wife Anoud, and her father Esam Ghazzawi, an advisor to a Saudi prince. The al-Hijjis abruptly left their home in Sarasota two weeks before the September 11 attacks, leaving behind jewelry, clothing, and cars.
An original FBI investigation reportedly uncovered links between the Hijjis and the 9/11 attacks, but subsequent FBI statements denied the connections. In 2012, the website Broward Bulldog (now Florida Bulldog) filed a FOIA request for FBI files regarding the case.
In 2014, the FBI released 11 pages, including statements reiterating that the al-Hijjis had left the U.S. shortly before the 9/11 attacks and that "further investigation" had revealed "many connections" between the family and 9/11 suspects, the Miami Herald reported.
To make matters worse, Mueller's FBI kept secret an investigation into Russian corruption in the U.S. uranium market — just as Hillary Clinton was approving the Uranium One deal, handing over 20 percent of U.S. uranium to a Russian company. In contrast, the FBI worked fast to apprehend Russian spies when they got too close to Clinton.Read more here.
Mueller's FBI also purged anti-terrorism training material of any documents deemed "offensive" to certain Muslim groups, according to documents revealed by Judicial Watch in 2013. Mueller met with the Islamist organizations Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), two groups named as co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terror financing case.
...Did Mueller's FBI cover up the al-Hijjis' connections to 9/11 out of some desire to placate Muslims or to honor Saudi Arabia? Expect more revelations about this case as Zloch processes the FBI documents.
Words backed up by action
President Trump made some unscripted remarks to the press today about the Palestinian Authority. Ace of Spades humorously observes,
The Times of Israel has the story here.
Trump to Palestinian Authority: No More Aid, No More Talking, No More Anything Until You Commit to Peace
—Ace
This Trump is so boorish. I wish we had a well-spoken chubby-faced College Boy like Marco who would talk tough for conservative crowds and then pursue the perpetual pay-off-the-Palestinians plan that the Establishment prefers.
Oh well. We'll just have to take the crudity of words backed up by actual action instead of more words.
The Times of Israel has the story here.
Are the nation's law enforcement agencies being used for political purposes?
Has there ever been an opening monolog as powerful and important as this one by Tucker Carlson?
Can we handle transparency?
Nancy Pelosi sounds a little pissed at the Dreamers, who shout her down in total disrespect. Is that any way to treat your number one advocate?
More than one thousand private jets have flown rich people to Davos, Switzerland to worry about global warming and make policies we normals have to abide by. President Trump is headed there today. Were there no commercial flights available for these non-presidents? Tucker points out that the commercial flight would expend one-tenth the fuel of the private jets.
Jordan Peterson is one of Tucker's guests. Tucker asks him if there is one piece of advice he would recommend for all of us. "Stop saying things that make you weak. Be strong!" Peterson emphasizes the choices we make. To shut up and pretend that you think something different is to warp your soul. Are you capable of disliking your children? If you let them misbehave in a way that makes you dislike them, you are going to take revenge on them in a bad way.
Can we handle transparency?
Nancy Pelosi sounds a little pissed at the Dreamers, who shout her down in total disrespect. Is that any way to treat your number one advocate?
More than one thousand private jets have flown rich people to Davos, Switzerland to worry about global warming and make policies we normals have to abide by. President Trump is headed there today. Were there no commercial flights available for these non-presidents? Tucker points out that the commercial flight would expend one-tenth the fuel of the private jets.
Jordan Peterson is one of Tucker's guests. Tucker asks him if there is one piece of advice he would recommend for all of us. "Stop saying things that make you weak. Be strong!" Peterson emphasizes the choices we make. To shut up and pretend that you think something different is to warp your soul. Are you capable of disliking your children? If you let them misbehave in a way that makes you dislike them, you are going to take revenge on them in a bad way.
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
Dr. Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules for Life
What are the Twelve Rules for Life promulgated by YouTube sensation Dr. Jordan Peterson?
1. Stand up straight with your shoulders back.
2. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping.
3. Make friends with people who want the best for you.
4. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today.
5. Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them.
6. Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world.
7. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient.
8. Tell the truth, or at least don't lie.
9. Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don't.
10. Be precise in your speech.
11. Do not bother children when they are skateboarding.
12. Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street.
He explains each one here.
1. Stand up straight with your shoulders back.
2. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping.
3. Make friends with people who want the best for you.
4. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today.
5. Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them.
6. Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world.
7. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient.
8. Tell the truth, or at least don't lie.
9. Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don't.
10. Be precise in your speech.
11. Do not bother children when they are skateboarding.
12. Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street.
He explains each one here.
Four other times in our recent history where documents mysteriously disappeared
At Breitbart, John Nolte reports,
America’s federal government and its extra-legal Deep State have once again proven to be hopelessly corrupt with the news over the weekend that the FBI lost five months worth of text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Both are senior FBI officials who, while allegedly engaged in an extra-marital affair, traded a number of disturbing text messages about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.Nolte then reminds us of four other times in recent history that documents mysteriously disappeared.
Whoops! Hillary Clinton Deletes 33,000 Emails After Receiving SubpoenaRead more here.
On March 4, 2015, Hillary Clinton received a subpoena to turn over all Benghazi-related emails.
Three weeks later, she had 33,000 emails deleted that were on her secret home server.
This was more than two years after she left her job as Barack Obama’s secretary of state.
Whoops! Those 30 Subpoenaed Benghazi Emails
Although former-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton assured everyone that she handed over all work-related emails, 30 emails directly related to Benghazi were eventually recovered.
Whoops! IRS Executive Lois Lerner’s 24,000 Subpoenaed Emails “Accidentally” Lost
Lois Lerner was in charge of the tax-exempt department of the Internal Revenue Service while that unit persecuted Obama’s political enemies in the Tea Party movement, which basically hamstrung them with blizzards of paperwork, intrusive questions, and anything else that would keep their focus off of political action that might damage Obama’s re-election chances in 2012.
While Congress was investigating the scandal, we learned that — oops! — 24,000 Lerner emails were “accidentally” deleted in 2014, even though congress had issued a subpoena a full nine months earlier ordering the IRS not to delete any communications.
Whoops! Hillary Email Archive Lost In the Mail
A 2013 archive of Hillary’s infamous emails was lost in the mail. The archive was on a laptop and thumb drive and just … disappeared.
"Leadership is different from being a sucker and being a patsy."
Are you a trade or economic wonk? Sundance has videos of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in interviews and panel discussions in Davos, Switzerland at the World Economic Forum.
“Before we get into sticks and stones about free trade we ought to first talk about, is there really free trade or is it a unicorn in the garden,” said Ross. {{{ZING}}} Again, no response from the panel. Despite the tariffs Trump imposed this week on solar panels and washing machines, China is hoping for a “bumper year” for new trade deals, according to China’s own Commerce Ministry.Read more here.
Another Rossism: … “We don’t intend to abrogate leadership, but leadership is different from being a sucker and being a patsy. We would like to be the leader in making the world trade system more fair and more equitable to all participants.” …
Who knows what Nunes has seen?
Sundance writes another helpful explanation of the rapidly unraveling story of Obama administration corruption.
Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff.Read more here.
Dollar getting weaker and Treasury Secretary is not alarmed
Ben White reports in Politico,
The Trump administration declared a surprising war on the U.S. dollar on Wednesday, breaking from a long tradition in which top American officials generally voice support for a strong American currency.Read more here.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin shocked Wall Street by lauding the impact a weaker dollar can have on U.S. companies as it makes exports cheaper for other countries to buy.
“Obviously, a weaker dollar is good for us as it relates to trade and opportunities,” Mnuchin told reporters in Davos. Mnuchin said recent declines in the value of the dollar against other currencies were “not a concern of ours at all.”
The dollar continued its recent descent following Mnuchin’s remarks. It’s now down about 10 percent against a basket of other currencies since last January, when President Donald Trump said the greenback was “too strong,” making it hard for U.S. companies to compete against China and other countries.
The currency decline has puzzled some economists and Wall Street traders because the dollar generally rises in value as the economy improves and the Federal Reserve increases interest rates. Yields on U.S. Treasury debt are currently rising as the Fed shifts policy. Rising yields usually make the dollar more attractive to investors, but the greenback keeps dropping.
Mueller interviews Sessions and Comey, NBC helps North Korea spread propaganda, NFL allows players to wear socks depicting cops as pigs, but refuses a "Please Stand" ad from Vets, Hawaii's Governor couldn't remember his Twitter password so citizens were not informed of false scare for 17 minutes!
The one Leftie on the panel, Juan Williams, provides us with news I had not seen on the sources I trust. Mueller has interviewed both Attorney General Sessions and former FBI Director Comey.
Greg: We have a 17-day bathroom break between the government shutdown and whatever is going to happen on February 8. Democrats put illegal aliens before American citizens.
NBC is accused of helping North Korea spread propaganda. Check out Lester Holt at a North Korean ski area, with lots of North Koreans in shiny new ski clothes, while millions of their citizens are starving! Greg Gutfeld points out that this is a trick used by other Communist countries: invite an American celebrity into the country and treat them well, so that they become advocates for the Commies.
Kimberley informs us that North Korea's army is starving and being told to steal food from starving farmers.
Juan points out that the South Korean leader Moon's decision to allow North and South Korean Olympians to march together at the Olympics is not necessarily helpful to America's efforts to pressure North Korea to get rid of their nuclear weapons.
Jesse points out that the NFL allows players to wear socks with cops dressed up as pigs, but disallows an ad from a veterans group that was entitled Please Stand!
Greg points out that the NFL will reject an ad like that, but will approve of just about anything to run in their other commercials.
Greg informs us that the Hawaiian governor took 17 minutes to inform Hawaiians that the alert of an incoming nuclear bomb was fake. His excuse? I couldn't remember my Twitter password! Greg asked, "Is this state run by teenagers? He answers his own question. "No, it's worse! It's run by Democrats, which basically are teenagers with power!" One more jab by Greg. "Maybe they should think twice about criticizing Trump's tweets. At least he knows how!"
Greg: We have a 17-day bathroom break between the government shutdown and whatever is going to happen on February 8. Democrats put illegal aliens before American citizens.
NBC is accused of helping North Korea spread propaganda. Check out Lester Holt at a North Korean ski area, with lots of North Koreans in shiny new ski clothes, while millions of their citizens are starving! Greg Gutfeld points out that this is a trick used by other Communist countries: invite an American celebrity into the country and treat them well, so that they become advocates for the Commies.
Kimberley informs us that North Korea's army is starving and being told to steal food from starving farmers.
Juan points out that the South Korean leader Moon's decision to allow North and South Korean Olympians to march together at the Olympics is not necessarily helpful to America's efforts to pressure North Korea to get rid of their nuclear weapons.
Jesse points out that the NFL allows players to wear socks with cops dressed up as pigs, but disallows an ad from a veterans group that was entitled Please Stand!
Greg points out that the NFL will reject an ad like that, but will approve of just about anything to run in their other commercials.
Greg informs us that the Hawaiian governor took 17 minutes to inform Hawaiians that the alert of an incoming nuclear bomb was fake. His excuse? I couldn't remember my Twitter password! Greg asked, "Is this state run by teenagers? He answers his own question. "No, it's worse! It's run by Democrats, which basically are teenagers with power!" One more jab by Greg. "Maybe they should think twice about criticizing Trump's tweets. At least he knows how!"
"Who was actually colluding with the Russians? It is becoming more clear!"
Senator Charles Grassley is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Today he spoke directly to the members of the Senate. Here are some excerpts from the transcript as published by Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse..
As we know now, Mr. Steele was hired by Fusion GPS to research Mr. Trump’s alleged ties to Russia. His work was funded by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Remember, it took a subpoena and a court battle with the House Intelligence committee to force that fact out into the open.Read more here.
Lawyers for the DNC and Clinton Campaign officials denied it to the press for months. They lied. The founder of Fusion GPS denied that his firm was “Democrat-linked.” That was untrue. When the news finally broke, New York Times reporters actually complained that people who knew better had flat out lied to them about who funded Mr. Steele’s dossier.
But, back before the 2016 election, it is unclear who knew that Steele was gathering dirt on Trump for the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Many of his sources for claims about the Trump campaign are Russian government officials. So, Steele, who was working for Fusion GPS, who was working for the DNC and the Clinton campaign, was working with the Russians. So, who was actually colluding with Russians? It’s becoming more clear.
So, it was a collection of unverified opposition research funded by a political opponent in an election year. Would it be proper for the Obama administration—or any administration—to use something like that to authorize further investigation that intrudes on the privacy of people associated with its political opponents?
That should bother civil libertarians of any political stripe.
...It sure looks like a bureaucratic game of hide the ball, rather than a genuine concern about national security. I am pressing this issue with Director Wray, and I hope that we can provide this information to the public as soon as possible.
...Here in the Senate, the Judiciary Committee has access to the same information that the House Intelligence Committee saw before drafting its summary memo. Our committee does not have the same authority to release classified information. We have to rely on the agency to review and potentially declassify our memo.
Obama thought he was an expert at deception!
At National Review, Andrew McCarthy continues to point out that
If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton–Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges. That is why such an indictment of Hillary Clinton was never going to happen. The latest jaw-dropping disclosures of text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, illustrate this point.Read more here.
...What most alarmed Obama and Clinton advisers (those groups overlap) was not only that there were several Clinton–Obama email exchanges, but also that Obama dissembled about his knowledge of Clinton’s private email use in a nationally televised interview.
...On March 4, just after the New York Times broke the news about Clinton’s email practices at the State Department, John Podesta (a top Obama adviser and Clinton’s campaign chairman) emailed Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s confidant and top aide in the Obama State Department) to suggest that Clinton’s “emails to and from potus” should be “held” — i.e., not disclosed — because “that’s the heart of his exec privilege.” At the time, the House committee investigating the Benghazi jihadist attack was pressing for production of Clinton’s emails.
As his counselors grappled with how to address his own involvement in Clinton’s misconduct, Obama deceptively told CBS News in a March 7 interview that he had found out about Clinton’s use of personal email to conduct State Department business “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.” Perhaps he was confident that, because he had used an alias in communicating with Clinton, his emails to and from her — estimated to number around 20 — would remain undiscovered.
Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House insisted that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, of course; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit: Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information, and (2) to avoid using the term “executive privilege” — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.
...All cleaned up: no indictment, meaning no prosecution, meaning no disclosure of Clinton–Obama emails. It all worked like a charm . . . except for the part where Mrs. Clinton wins the presidency and the problem is never spoken of again.
Kerry stands with the Palestinian terrorist protectors
Traitor John Kerry violates the Logan Act by sending a message to Palestinian terrorist protector Abbas telling him "Don't give in to Trump." He also told Abbas that he is thinking of running for president in 2020. Read more here.
Hat tip to Ace of Spades, who adds,
Hat tip to Ace of Spades, who adds,
I was told it was a crime when Trump aides, during the transition, reached out to foreign leaders.
"We have one president at a time," the Washington Post and other DNC front groups intoned.
Well?
Where is the call for a special prosecutor now?
Media corruption
It's about time somebody told this truth:
The Problem Isn’t Just Corruption at the FBI and Main Justice, It’s Also The Media…That is the headline Sundance puts on his latest post at The Conservative Treehouse.
Over the past year we have learned that a significant number of people within the DOJ and FBI have been the source of leaks to the media. Almost all of those leaks built on lies.Read more here.
Reports have confirmed that FBI Director James Comey, his chief legal counsel, James Baker as well as his chief-of-staff James Rybicki have all be leaking to media outlets.
In addition, FBI Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page have been identified as leaking stories to Politico, the Washington Post and New York Times. Adding to that mix, Asst. AG Sally Yates, Asst. AG John Carlin and a host of Main Justice officials were also participating in leaks; all leaks based on self-interest.
DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie Ohr were both in close contact with Glenn Simpson and Fusion-GPS, and that entity has admitted openly to shopping -and selling- stories to the media, under the auspices of ‘anonymous sources’. Those financially distributed Fusion-GPS stories went to a host of friendly and ideological media outlets.
In total, hundreds of leaks from the Obama White House via, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice and the larger intelligence community staff, add up to thousands of media reports which were then re-reported by dozens more media outlets filing their reports under citations of “according to a report in (fill-in-blank)“.
...Nothing within their collective need to will-an-outcome will change the media’s proximity to facts when the truthful story behind the DOJ and FBI corruption is finally exposed. The media are so far away from the place where this story ends, they have no inherent capability to even begin to travel in the opposite direction, toward the truth.
...Introspection of the level needed to admit their prior gullibility and attempt recovery would be akin to Al Gore admitting to the foundational lies of man-made global warming.
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
The text message gap spans the period between Dec. 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017
At The Daily Caller, Chuck Ross reports about Congressman Jim Jordan:
“Everybody knows the IRS is incompetent,” Jordan told TheDC on Sunday. “But we’re talking about the FBI here.”Read more here.
“If this is true, they lost the text messages from the guy who was deputy head of counterintelligence? I mean, come on. If this actually happened this is unbelievable, and it’s why we would need to investigate it.”
Asked whether the House Judiciary Committee plans to look into the missing texts, Jordan responded, “of course.”
He also re-upped his call for a second special counsel in addition to Mueller to look into the handling of the Russia probe as well as the infamous Steele dossier.
“The time for a special counsel is now,” he said on Twitter after talking to TheDC, joining other Republicans who have pushed for oversight of the Russia probe.
“If it wasn’t already clear we need a second special counsel, it’s abundantly clear now,” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows said on Twitter.
The text message gap spans the period between Dec. 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017, according to Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of HSGAC.
That’s a crucial timespan in the FBI’s Russia investigation, which Strzok was picked to oversee in July 2016.
During that period, the infamous Steele dossier was published, Strzok interviewed then-national security adviser Michael Flynn about contacts he had with Russia’s ambassador (he pleaded guilty in December to lying during that interview), and James Comey was fired as FBI director. On the final day of the five-month gap, Robert Mueller was appointed to serve as special counsel on the Russia investigation.
Gap in the FBI "secret society" texts, plus an arrogant CEO of a clothing company
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

