We're not buying it, Samantha!

Samantha Powers' testimony before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee is getting lots of reaction on the web. She said someone else made the unmasking requests (260 of them) in her name, but she doesn't know who did it. Here are comments from some of the readers of the Ace of Spades website.

We would be able to trace exactly who made the fraudulent unmaskings, but the details were on a hard drive and, gosh darn it, the thing crashed just yesterday. Totally unrecoverable. We checked. And since it was unrecoverable, we ran it over with a steamroller and melted it in the incinerator, so there is nothing left to even look at.
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at October 18, 2017 12:30 PM (dnWSK)

And the Obama Plan reaches its ultimate goal - so much corruption involving previous administration officials that the system is overloaded and the public's appetite for justice is crushed by sheer volume.

On top of immigration invasion insanity, crazed spree killers and conspiracies, rogue "sanctuary cities", Antifa riots in the streets, MS13 invasion, kangaroo fake rape courts, Nork nukes, Shadow Government /Deep State,Data breaches, Traitorous and worthless Congress, malware, creeping Communism in the schools and the NFL, 60% of the country on meds, 49% of America clinically insane, can't even repeal the shittiest and most unwanted piece of legislation in American History, backstabbing Fascist judges overruling EOs ...

Investigate WHAT? The whole damn thing is a maggot infested pus bucket.

Where in the hell do you even start?
Posted by: Mortimer - disappointed at October 18, 2017 12:37 PM (2wRtc)

So she didn't make the unmasking requests.... AND the information wasn't delivered to her? Bullshit.

Posted by: Idlepundit at October 18, 2017 12:32 PM (tdVTp)

This!!

After the first time the information came to her she was all either like:
"Hey, who requested this illegal shit using my password? Why even having this on my desk is a crime. I better get to the bottom of this right away because it might reflect badly on my reputation and put me in a position to be incriminated in a conspiracy and potential jail time."
Or
"Hey, Cool. It worked. Let's do it 259 more times!"
Not sure which, but I think we just found a flippable patsy.

Hmmm.... so we just had a Government Official say that her access to Classified information was hijacked...

That someone falsified her access... that is a HUGE accusation....

Yet, we are only hearing about this from a LEAKED comment, to a Congressional Committee... YEARS after it happened?

Just where the hell is the DOJ?????
Posted by: Don Q. at October 18, 2017 12:39 PM (NgKpN)