Friday, March 27, 2015

Not just hard, but impossible

The New York Times wants leniency for Bowe Bergdahl. James Taranto comments at The Wall Street Journal,
The paper concludes that “trying him . . . stands to accomplish little at this point.” Further: “A conviction would most likely deprive a traumatized veteran of benefits, including medical care, which he will probably need for years. A dishonorable discharge would make it harder to rebuild his life as a civilian.” Time noted last year, but the Times editorial omits, that “six soldiers . . . died hunting for him after he went missing.” Rebuilding their lives isn’t just hard but impossible.
Read more here.

Alternative words to describe Hillary

Hillary's team has put out a warning to the media not to use certain terms in describing Hillary. Well, okay then, we'll be very careful! Two guest bloggers at Bob's Blog have submitted alternative words to describe Hillary.

Lt. Col. Curt Dale suggests,
predatory, oily, abiding, ruthless, obsequious, fawning, manipulative, gold digging, entrapping, a Black Widow, scheming, conniving, hysterical, premenstrual, and a Dragon Lady.

Suzann Darnell has this to say:
It Isn’t Sexist to Describe Someone Accurately!

The terms Hillary’s folks have deemed sexist include: polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over-confident, and secretive. I totally understand why they want to make these descriptive terms out of bounds. Most of them are extremely negative. Particularly when attached to someone like Hillary Clinton. Or Barack Obama. Or Nancy Pelosi. Or . . . almost any other leading Democrat I can think of on the spur of the moment.

But, these terms are not just negative. They are TRUE! Hillary is polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over-confident, and secretive. It has been made more than apparent in her past and present that she has very little in the way of regard for ethics and her moral compass is so skewed as to be completely useless, except for circling right back around to exactly what she’s done before.

So, what would make us think she’d be any different in the future? Especially with even more power? I think she would only be more untrustworthy. Some people just seem to be poster-children for old adages like, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” I think this would be Hillary to the max!

But, I think the list of nine words is vastly incomplete. In addition to all of the above, she is hateful, arrogant, incompetent, ruthless, manipulative, and the list can go on and on and on and . . . In short she is a complete witch (I used this word instead of the other one) who will lie, cheat, and steal to get what she wants and protect her hindquarters. If Benghazi is any indication, she might well even kill.

FBI disrupts plot to kill scores at Illinois military base

Adam Goldman reports at The Washington Post this morning that
The FBI has disrupted a plot to kill scores at a military base on behalf of Islamic State.
Read the story here.

Thanks to Instapundit

Egypt-Saudi invasion of Yemen imminent

The American Interest informs us this morning that an Egypt-Saudi invasion of Yemen is imminent.
the AP reports:

Egyptian security and military officials say Saudi Arabia and Egypt will lead a ground operation in Yemen against Shiite rebels and their allies after a campaign of airstrikes to weaken them.

American Interest adds:
The Egyptians’ decision to return to Yemen, which is essentially their Vietnam, is extremely significant. It reflects both enormous fear on the part of the Sunni powers and the strength of the Saudi-led alliance.

Events in Yemen continue to accelerate much faster than many experts predicted, and the potential for widespread sectarian war between Sunni and Shi’a grows more acute by the day. In some ways this portends even more trouble than ISIS’s fight against Iran’s proxies in Syria and Iraq: that fight is both bloody and strategically important, but ISIS is also an enemy of the Sunni powers (whose rule it wants to overthrow). Now, the Saudis and their allies are clearly prepared to confront Iran’s allies head-on.

The price of the Obama Administration’s comprehensive failure of strategy in the Middle East may be very high.

Thanks to Instapundit

Start small

Seth Godin often reminds that we may be overlooking the obvious. Today he writes about hypergrowth.
Fast growth comes from overwhelming the smallest possible audience with a product or service that so delights that they insist that their friends and colleagues use it. And hypergrowth is a version of the same thing, except those friends and colleagues quickly become even bigger fans, and tell even more people.

Often, we get sidetracked when we forget about "smallest possible." If you make the audience you're initially serving too big, you will dilute the very thing you set out to make, avoid critical mass, and compromise the magic of what you're building. You'll make average stuff for average people instead of something powerful for the few.

By "smallest possible" I don't mean, "too small." I mean the smallest number that eventually leads to the kernel of conversation that enables you to grow.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Fishing for space junk

The problem:
Just a single centimeter-sized screw could hit a spacecraft with the impact of a hand grenade.

Space junk travels at speeds up to 17,500 mph – this velocity means just a teeny tiny piece of junk, like a fleck of paint, could damage a spacecraft or satellite.

Abandoned spacecraft, launch vehicle stages, and mission debris are just a few of the sources of junk large and small.

Some of the stuff up there is several tons and, clearly, a collision would have serious results. Some debris, such as batteries and leftover fuel, could also be explosive as a result of solar heating.

One collision could even produce a chain reaction of further collisions.

For example, a defunct Russian satellite collided with and destroyed a U.S. Iridium commercial satellite in 2009. This collision added more than 2,000 pieces of trackable debris to the space junk problem.

In another example, when China deployed a missile to destroy a satellite in 2007, an additional 3,000 pieces of debris was added to space.
The Solution:
Fishing. Recent tests for space age ‘space nets’ by the European Space Agency have proved very successful.

While fishing nets have been in use for several thousand years, space nets take this this ancient piece of technology to a whole new level.

The hope is that nets could be deployed to capture and remove space threats. The ESA announced that its cutting-edge nets passed orbit testing with flying colors this week.

To test the nets in a space-like atmosphere, Canada’s Falcon 20 aircraft flew parabolic arcs. Each arc provided 20 seconds of weightless conditions as the plane fell through the sky and cancelled out gravity.

Over the course of 21 parabolas and two days, twenty net tests were conducted inside the aircraft.

The rainbow-colored nets were packed inside paper cartons. Each corner was weighted to help it entangle its target. A compressed air ejector shot the net at a satellite. The thinner version of the net proved more successful than the thicker one.

The ESA reported that the nets worked so well that they usually had to be cut away with a knife.

The National Research Council of Canada, Poland’s SKA Polska and OptiNav and Italy’s STAM were involved in the ESA project.
Read more here.

Thanks to Instapundit

What is known so far about the co-pilot of the Germanwings Airbus

Josie Ensor and David Lawler have extensive coverage in The Telegraph and Tom Porter in International Business Times about Andreas Lubitz, the 27-year-old co-pilot who "intentionally killed" 150 people by crashing the plane he was flying into the Alps. Here are two photos of him, for those of you who claim to be able to figure people out by looking at their photos.

Read The Telegraph coverage here.
I am flying tomorrow to spend Spring Break with my kids. I will be sure to establish eye contact with the pilots, if I have the opportunity.

Pentagon declassifies details about Israel's nuclear program

Here is another topic that the mainstream media has missed:
(The) Pentagon saw fit to declassify sections on Israel's sensitive nuclear program, (but) it kept sections on Italy, France, West Germany and other NATO countries classified, with those sections blocked out in the document. reveals:
In a development that has largely been missed by mainstream media, the Pentagon early last month quietly declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document detailing Israel's nuclear program, a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race, and which the US until now has respected by remaining silent.

But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the US reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel's nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth.
Read more here.

the renewable-fuel standards mandating ethanol is "one of the worst examples of corporate welfare in America."

Betsy Newmark notes that the Renewable Fuel Standard law
doesn't achieve its stated purpose and has all sorts of pernicious unintended consequences. Rather like Obamacare.
Read more here.

The Obama Doctrine for the Mideast

Max Boot describes the Obama doctrine for the Mideast:
Call it the Obama Doctrine: The U.S. puts down the burden, and Iran picks up the slack.

A corollary to Mr. Obama’s vow to make the “tide of war” recede is his determination, if forced to fight, to employ air power alone. The U.S. took part in the NATO air campaign to depose Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, but afterward Mr. Obama refused to send a peacekeeping force, a decision that has consigned the country to anarchy. Now Mr. Obama is launching airstrikes against Islamic State while refusing to commit to any ground troops—even though they are essential to ensuring the success of airstrikes.
Read more here.


The Wall Street Journal also weighs in on the Bergdahl fiasco:
At the time of the release, Mr. Obama said he had a sacred obligation as Commander in Chief to do everything possible to bring the sergeant home. Maybe so, but the President made his real motives clear when he noted that the transfer was part of “the transition process of ending a war” and that he wanted to “whittle away” the number of Gitmo detainees. That, he told NBC, “is going to involve, on occasion, releasing folks who we may not trust but we can’t convict.”

This is the language of a President more concerned with pursuing his ideological fixations, and fulfilling a misbegotten campaign pledge, than winning a war or securing the country....

Meanwhile, the war in Afghanistan shows no sign of ending, while an emboldened Taliban can look forward to getting their old commanders back after their obligatory year in Qatar ends in June. Sgt. Bergdahl will now face a court martial, but we already know that the White House is guilty of deserting its obligations to U.S. security.

Fairy tale

Tom Bevan comments on the Bergdahl fairy tale:
far from the fairy tale of a hero’s homecoming that President Obama tried to spin for the American people that Saturday morning 10 months ago, this story doesn’t have a happy ending for America. In his effort to empty the Gitmo detainee facility, the president traded five hard-core terrorists for a man who now stands officially accused of abandoning his fellow soldiers. He very may well be court-martialed and spend a good deal of his life behind bars. It’s the Taliban 5 who, beginning in just a few short weeks, get to live happily ever after.
Read more here.

Do we know our destination?

A person named Jonah comments on a Steve Sailer piece:
hypergamy – the propensity for women to “marry up”, and the willingness of men to “marry down” in favor of looks or other non IQ traits...

...And yes, the math checks out. Dumb, low status men, and ugly smart women are more frequently shut out of the marriage game than their gender opposites.
Chateau Heartiste adds,
High achieving men experience a gradual increase in their SMVs peaking at right about the time same-age women’s SMVs are crashing into the Wall. Many of these men go on to second or third younger wives, and produce second or third families of scions.
(SMV is Sexual Market Value).

CH (he loves to abbreviate) concludes:
What was once common — a vital middle class distinguished by fathers smarter and higher achieving than mothers — has become a curiosity gawked at by the destroyers of harmony.

We know our trajectory. What we don’t know is our destination. So certain are you that a bright, sunshiney day waits at the end?
Read more here.

Who is smarter, your mom or your dad?

Laws of nature

1. Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.

2. Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.

3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.

4. Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.

5. Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help.

6. Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now.

7. Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.

8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.

9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will.

10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

11. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.

12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.

13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.

14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.

15. Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly.

17. Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet.

18. Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.

19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician.
Thanks to Curt Dale

If it's worth listening to, it's worth questioning until you understand it.

Seth Godin says there are two kinds of listening.

The kind of listening we're trained to do in school and at work is passive listening. Sit still. Get through it. Figure out what's going to be on the test and ignore the rest. Your eyes can glaze over, but don't let it show. Try not to nod off. People are talking, and they'd like the illusion of listening to accompany that. Don't interrupt.

Passive listening is letting the other person talk.

Active listening, on the other hand, requires that you interrupt when you need a clarification, and it requires that you ask a truly difficult question when the speaker is finished.

If it's worth listening to, it's worth questioning until you understand it.

Cruz and Walker can win

Dick Morris believes Ted Cruz can become the next president. He is also impressed with Scott Walker. Both men will be attacked by the leftwing media. However, both will be able to fire up voters who stayed home the last two elections. Watch the Morris video here.

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

A farmer's legacy

Do you know the name Norman Borlaug? He is credited with saving one billion lives. Don Surber writes:
The way to fight diseases that attack wheat and other cereals was not through pesticides and the like, but rather through breeding. Spoiled, rich liberals today pooh-pooh and demonize GMO food, but mankind has been modifying plants since the dawn of civilization. Indeed, it is what led to civilization. We call it farming.
Surber quotes Sailil Singh:

Paul Ehrlich, who famously wrote in The Population Bomb, his 1968 bestseller: "The battle to feed all of humanity is over," and "In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now." Ehrlich also said, "I have yet to meet anyone familiar with the situation who thinks India will be self-sufficient in food by 1971." He insisted that "India couldn't possibly feed two hundred million more people by 1980."

Little did Ehrlich know that Borlaug and his team were already engaged in the kind of 'crash program' he had declared would never work. Working in Mexico, they had developed a special breed of dwarf wheat that resisted a wide spectrum of plant pests and diseases and produced two to three times more grain than the traditional varieties.

C. Subramaniam, then minister of Food and Agriculture in India, came to know of Borlaug's work. It was transparently obvious to him that this was the answer to India's crisis. Acting with great urgency, the Indian government took the plunge, and several chartered Boeing 707s loaded with 16,000 metric tonnes of seeds of the new 'miracle wheat' headed for the eastern skies.

Borlaug's team began teaching local farmers in the region how to cultivate this new strain of wheat properly, in both India and Pakistan. Borlaug's work is credited with sparking what has come to be known as the "Green Revolution" in these countries, defying all predictions and achieving an astounding increase in the production of wheat within the span of a few years.
Read more here.

The Chairless Chair

The Chairless Chair is an exoskeleton that allows workers to sit without straining their muscles. Audi

Liz Stinson writes at Wired about the Chairless Chair.
Created by Swiss startup Noonee, it’s a hydraulic powered chair that lends lower-body support to people who have to stand all day long. You can think of it as a really bad-ass wearable or an especially lame exoskeleton.

The design is straightforward: A titanium frame hugs the back of the worker’s leg like a flexible brace, while a support belt is strapped around their torso. Workers can stand and walk like normal, but when they want to sit, pushing a button locks the frame into place at the desired angle. The weight the body is transfered through the frame to the floor or the heels.
Read more here.

Thanks to Instapundit

It's not the size of her butt

It's the specific angle of spinal curvature that men find attractive.
Chalk up male preferences for women with a curvy backside to prehistoric influences.

A study, published online in Evolution and Human Behavior, investigated men's mate preference for women with a "theoretically optimal angle of lumbar curvature," a 45.5 degree curve from back to buttocks allowing ancestral women to better support, provide for, and carry out multiple pregnancies.This morphology and men's psychological preference toward it have evolved over thousands of years, and they won't disappear over night.

"This tight fit between evolutionary pressures and modern humans' psychology, including our standards of attractiveness, highlights the usefulness that an evolutionary approach can have for expanding our knowledge not just of the natural sciences, but also the social sciences

Read more here.

Sure enough, we traded five top jihadists for a deserter

Thanks to Instapundit

Scott Johnson weighs in at Powerline:
It remains a bad deal wrapped in deceitful rhetoric and a complete humiliation of the United States

Recalling Obama’s and Rice’s praise of the deal, we see that they are willing to say anything in defense of a bad cause. We already knew that, but there is much more to come.
Read more here.

Pilot locked out of the cockpit in Alps crash

"You could hear him trying to smash the door down." Thomas Houston at Popular Mechanics has the story here.
thanks to Instapundit.

Scott Walker: winning without caving

Tonight Hugh Hewitt interviewed Governor Scott Walker. I am sure the interview will be up soon on Hugh's website, if it isn't already. I am impressed with Walker. I'd put him at the top of the list of GOP candidates right now. Despite all the battles he has had with the left in Wisconsin, he still reaches across the aisle to Democrats to get things done.

Update: The interview is here. An excerpt:
Part of what you see here is the old Lenin adage that you probe with bayonets. If you find mush, you proceed. If you find steel, you withdraw. Well, in Ukraine, he’s found mush, and he’s found mush not only from the United States, but from others like, others and NATO partners out there. If it were to extend, and my belief is we need a president who’s going to act aggressively by giving lethal force to the Ukrainians and others to try to preempt that from happening. But a couple of weeks ago, I met with the president of Estonia. Certainly, we saw a week ago the Lithuanian leadership is literally giving out literature telling their own citizens what to do if Russians invade. Latvia, I just talked to someone the other day whose mother immigrated here from Latvia, and in each of those Baltic states, there are real serious concerns about what happens if we don’t deal with this in Ukraine. We need American leadership not just for America’s sake, but for the world.

...don’t personalize your differences, because your opponent today may be your ally tomorrow. And so that doesn’t mean you should back away from policy. Obviously, if people watch me, I didn’t back away from the big challenges. I took on the big issues not just on public employee unions, but right to work, you name it. And voter ID just got upheld the other day. We’ve done all the big issues. But we don’t personalize it. The other side might, at least some of the activists might. But I still meet every week with the Democratic leadership in the state assembly and state senate.

The classic bully

Bret Stephens writes in the Wall Street Journal about Obama's upside-down worldview.
To adapt George Orwell’s motto for Oceania: Under Mr. Obama, friends are enemies, denial is wisdom, capitulation is victory.

The current victim of Mr. Obama’s moral inversions is the recently re-elected Israeli prime minister. Normally a sweeping democratic mandate reflects legitimacy, but not for Mr. Obama. Now we are treated to the astonishing spectacle in which Benjamin Netanyahu has become persona non grata for his comments doubting the current feasibility of a two-state solution. This, while his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas is in the 11th year of his four-year term, without a murmur of protest from the White House.

...For tiring of constant Palestinian bad faith — and noting the fact — Israel will now be treated to pariah-nation status by Mr. Obama.

...Here is my advice to the Israeli government, along with every other country being treated disdainfully by this crass administration: Repay contempt with contempt. Mr. Obama plays to classic bully type. He is abusive and surly only toward those he feels are either too weak, or too polite, to hit back.

The Israelis will need to chart their own path of resistance. On the Iranian nuclear deal, they may have to go rogue: Let’s hope their warnings have not been mere bluffs. Israel survived its first 19 years without meaningful U.S. patronage. For now, all it has to do is get through the next 22, admittedly long, months.
Read more here.

"Being angry is their stock and trade"

Midge Decter says feminism has been a disaster for American women. More below on how feminists turned on Betty Friedan when she met a man she loved, and therefore "softened," the hookup culture, gender fluidity, and how the relations between men and women have hit bottom. What we needed to do was a lot of hard work on matters such as civil rights. We didn't do that. We looked for quick fixes, like affirmative action, and left ourselves vulnerable to those who make a racket out of racial politics. Enjoy this wonderful 87-year-old woman.

thanks to John Podhoretz

It's good to be a Bush. The Bush with balls.

Did you know that Jeb Bush calls himself an introvert? Andrew Ferguson writes today at The Weekly Standard,
It’s an odd frailty for a professional politician, and Bush says it took him years of effort to overcome his inborn shyness.

“I learned that in order to make your case, or in order to serve or in order to advance a cause, you have to connect with people,” he said earlier this year. “You have to engage with people, look ’em in the eye, connect with them on a human level, understand where they’re coming from.”

Ferguson continues on about the potential Bush candidacy,
Bush’s enthusiasm for the Common Core educational standards and his advocacy of leniency for illegal immigrants apparently mark him as a “moderate,” a designation the political press has happily taken up.

At the most recent Conservative Political Action Conference, in suburban Washington, D.C., the mention of Bush’s name produced a round of boos louder even than the catcalls that rained down after a mention of Hillary Clinton.

...To understand the strangeness of the position that Jeb Bush finds himself in, it helps to look at his record as a practicing politician—a governor. When he left office in 2007, the verdict on his tenure was unanimous among Republicans, “moderates” and right-wingers alike. Writing in this magazine at the time, Fred Barnes summed it up: After two terms in office, Bush was not only the best governor in America but also the most conservative. Moreover, Republicans assumed that he was the former because he was the latter: His success was directly attributable to his ideology. That he should now be condemned as a moderate is a new and unexpected lesson in the education of Jeb Bush.

...The fall of his senior year he enrolled in a study-abroad course with the baggy title “Man and Society,” which took him to Mexico for several weeks. There he met the sister of a classmate’s girlfriend, a 17-year-old named Columba Gallo, known as Colu, and .  .  . “Boom! I was gone,” he said later. “She was the first girl I ever loved, and the last.”

Tradition suggested that the next stop on a Bush’s itinerary was Yale, alma mater to four generations of Jeb’s family. Instead he returned to Texas, where he had spent most of his boyhood, and enrolled in the University of Texas at Austin. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa in two and a half years, with a degree in Latin American Studies. He was admitted to UT law school but says he was too eager to get on with life to spend three years studying torts. He and Colu, by then 21 and 20, were married in the campus chapel, and their first child, George Prescott Bush, arrived two years later (followed in the next few years by a sister, Noelle, and a brother, Jeb).

... His first job out of UT was as an officer, and soon vice president, of a bank founded by the grandfather of James Baker, H. W.’s closest friend. It’s good to be a Bush.

The bank job took him and his family to Venezuela for two years, and he used the opportunity to perfect his command of Spanish. Jeb’s family still speak Spanish at home; his children’s first spoken words were in Spanish. Wiseguys have often noted that Jeb speaks Spanish more fluently than some Bushes speak English.

...He settled his family in Miami and, as the vice president’s son, partook modestly of the fame that can still inflame Iowa autograph hunters; Achenbach records a lunch in the late ’80s in which Bush was interrupted by waitresses and busboys asking for immigration help. He took a job with a real estate firm owned by a supporter of his father, hustling rental contracts for corporate clients and scouting investment opportunities. Before the decade was out he was making more than a million dollars a year. By the time he ran for governor, in 1994, he was a wealthy man. By all accounts Bush made his money because he was smart, tireless, creative, unflappable, personable, and a Bush.

...But it’s the ’94 campaign for Florida governor that works as the hinge in Jeb Bush’s political life, a shift whose effects are felt even now, as he introduces himself to voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. Already in 1994 he had the reputation of a committed conservative with a libertarian severity: a board member of the Heritage Foundation and reader of intellectual journals like Policy Review and the American Spectator, an aspiring egghead eager to master the minutiae of government policy in hopes of undoing or reversing the ill effects of government policy. Far more ideological than either his brother or his father, he was, said the political consultant Mike Murphy, “the Bush brother with balls.”

After losing the Florida governor's race in 1994, Bush came back in 1998 to win handily. Over that four year waiting period Jeb visited 250 scools, and spent many hours sitting in juvenilte courts to learn about the child welfare system.
In fact, his platform, still festooned with white papers, changed scarcely at all between ’94 and ’98. When Bush won handily, he could rightly claim a mandate for an ambitious agenda: tort reform, tax cuts, limits on abortion, school choice, and much else. Feeney, his first-time running mate, says: “He’d realized that if you’re going to grow the party you’re going to have to bring non-hardcore nonpartisans along with you, on reforms they might not be comfortable with otherwise. It wasn’t just winning an election. It was laying the groundwork for massive conservative reform.”

“Jeb Bush is as conservative as any governor in America, and much more so than most,” wrote the journalist Tucker Carlson in 1999. “But you’d never know it unless you listened carefully, or took a close look at the bills he supports. If Bush’s legislation is radical, his tone is all accommodation and empathy.”

The Bush record in Florida is like a wish list conjured from right-wing daydreams. With Republican majorities in both houses of the state legislature, “Bush made Florida into a laboratory of conservative governance,” writes Matthew T. Corrigan in Conservative Hurricane: How Jeb Bush Remade Florida, destined for now to be the definitive account of Bush’s eight years in Tallahassee.

Corrigan is a political science professor at the University of North Florida and shows every indication of having the political leanings common to his trade. He records with mounting horror the list of Bush’s successes. While Florida’s population grew by two million, the state government’s workforce declined by 13,000—the result of sweeping privatization of everything from state park maintenance to personnel management. At least one kind of state tax or another was cut every year he was in office, for a total of $19 billion. He left office with a $3 billion surplus in the state treasury. For the first time in history the state earned a AAA bond rating.

“I just think it’s humorous,” Tom Feeney says now, when reminded that lots of reporters and Republicans are calling Bush a moderate. “It’s pure revisionism for anyone to ignore the fact that he was the most conservative governor in the country.”

Ferguson goes on to document Bush's bonafides in abortion, racial policies, welfare, and gay rights, then shows how Bush reformed education. In fact, reform is just what he would like to do as president:
Why can’t presidents reform things? It seems to me there’s a lot of low-hanging fruit there: procurement policies, career civil service reform, job training programs, our public assistance programs—they’re all mired in the old way of doing things. Why can’t a president change things?”

Eventually he says: “You can be a conservative and still solve problems for people.”

Reading up on Bush’s record and talking about it with the (worshipful) people who helped make it happen, you might start to wonder: Is he pulling a Reverse Bush? For years conservative Republicans accused his father and brother of being closet moderates who only talked like conservatives for the sake of politics; the charge was generally accurate. Maybe Jeb is reversing the trick: a self-conscious, deep-dyed conservative who for the moment feels the need to look like a moderate, especially before an admiring press and in the company of the wealthy Republicans who these days are his constant companions and marks.

It’s a dicey strategy, if it’s a strategy at all. His constant refrain—he will use government according to conservative principles to help people—may fall flat in a party whose members, lots of them, don’t think they want government to help them at all; they just want it to leave them alone. Republicans still laugh at the old joke about the biggest lie: “I’m from the federal government and I’m here to help you.” Can Jeb Bush persuade them it’s not a joke after all?

His education, and ours, continues.
Read more here.
My only disappointment with this article is that it did not touch on Bush's record and views with regard to the issues of Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Common Core. Those are the two issues most often cited by conservatives as the reason they oppose Bush.

Hillary can't type! She is a hunt and pecker!

The Clintons, like Obama, have thrown many people under the bus. One of those is absolutely dedicated to fighting back. I am talking about Dick Morris, who was a top Clinton adviser during the Clinton presidency. I get a kick out of reading Morris's website every day and watching his videos. Today he has this bit: Hillary can't type!
She writes everything out in longhand. Really. Anyone who has spent time in meetings with her knows about her endless yellow pads.

So her emails will most likely turn out to be very short and quick. She wouldn’t spend a lot of time pecking out long letters. No way. That’s why the Benghazi Committee needs to also look very closely at the emails on private accounts that Hillary’s closest aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, maintained. Anything more than a few lines were most likely written by someone else on her behalf. There’s a reason why Hillary set up and used private emails with them for official business: all the important emails were likely written by her staff. Without access to them, we won’t know what was going on.

The Clintons never used the White House computer for their own work. Hillary even wrote (or copied) her book manuscripts in long hand. Although ghost writer Barbara Fineman was paid $120,000 for writing It Takes A Village, she proudly waved hundreds of hand-written pages on yellow legal pads to pretend she wrote it all herself. She never acknowledged Fineman’s work.

Bill can’t type either. When I wrote his 1995 State of the Union Speech, I typed it on an IBM Selectric that the White House dug up from the basement. He told me that he didn’t want me to put it in the official computer system, because then his staff would see it.

So, he carefully copied every word in his distinctive left hand penmanship. I still have a copy of it. Then he pretended that he had written it himself.

The Clintons have figured out every which way to avoid disclosure of what they want to keep private. So don’t expect a smoking gun in Hillary’s emails.

Look, instead, to Huma, Cheryl, Jake Sullivan, and Philippe Reines — if they still exist.
Read more here.

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

What's in Colorado's legal pot?

Colorado's legal marijuana is three times stronger than it was a generation ago and is often contaminated with heavy metals, pesticides, fungus and bacteria, a startling chemical analysis of 600 samples has found.

Additionally, modern pot has very low levels of cannabidiol, or CBD, the compound that medical marijuana advocates say gives the drug its healing properties. In most samples, the CBD levels were so small they were undetectable.

Also alarming is the fact that people using marijuana for its reported medicinal properties usually have no way of knowing how much CBD is actually in their products.

Colorado only requires marijuana dispensaries to test and advertise the levels of THC - the compound in pot that gets user 'high.' CBD and contaminant levels are not tested.

Children who are given marijuana to control epilepsy can actually be worse off because they're being given strains of the drug with virtually no CBD and high levels of THC, which can trigger seizures,
said Dr. Andy LaFrate, a Ph.D. chemist. Dr. LaFrate says
modern pot is two to three times stronger than it was a generation ago.

Even more troubling were the 200 samples of marijuana concentrates - or pot extract - that LaFrate tested. These are used to make edibles and can contain up to 90percent THC.

Because they are concentrated doses, they can also contain very high levels of heavy metals and pesticides - as the THC level is dialed up, so are the levels of background contaminants.

The solvents used like alcohol and heptane to make the concentrates also contribute startling levels of contaminants, LaFrate warned.
We can be thankful for British newspapers like the Daily Mail so that Colorado residents can learn about pot growing in Colorado!

Some good things

thanks to Ann Voskamp

Stepping up

thanks to Ann Voskamp

Are they electable?

Are Ted Cruz and Elizabeth Warren electable? James Taranto writes in the Wall Street Journal,
There’s one big difference, though, between Obama on the one hand and Cruz and Warren on the other. They are ideologically polarizing. So is Obama, but he wasn’t until he got elected president. For the most part, his rhetoric was vague and unifying, concealing his ideological ambitions. If it turns out Cruz and Warren aren’t electable, that may be the biggest reason.
Read more here.

Kindness was her passion

Blythe Hunt announces at Kara Tippets' blog Mundane Faithfulness that
Kara Tippetts went Home to Jesus on March 22, 2015, after a long battle with breast cancer.
Please read the rest of Blythe's words about Kara. Here is an excerpt:
Hearing a message about forgiveness prompted her to seek a relationship with Jesus, where she found total acceptance, kindness, and Grace. While she didn’t experience instant change in her life, dramatic changes were softly, slowly occurring in her heart as she trusted Christ’s love for her and allowed it to alter how she viewed the world and the people around her. She saw the difference a gentle word could make in response to an ugly remark, how an outstretched hand could break barriers of a hardened heart. Kindness became Kara’s passion; it defined her relationship with Jason, and then her four children: Eleanor, Harper, Lake, and Story Jane.

Ann Voskamp has written many times about Kara, and she adds her thoughts:
The frame around life, the death boundary around life, makes us appreciate every life as art.

We are in awe of breathing, of the gift of being, because it’s fleeting.

We love life more, the more we realize all this lovely life is transient.

...For the mortal, it feels impossible to understand the close distance of eternity.

...We must always have an imagination for the grace that will meet us. to travel well, right through to the end…to the end that ushers us into the beginning forever.

...“When you come to the end of yourself, that’s when something else can begin.”

...What does it matter if we know how to live well — but not know how to die well? Especially when dying is our last act of living here?

...We needed someone to show us how and Kara taught us how to die.

...Because she’d recovered the art of living well —she had an imagination to trust that the love and beauty she had found in life would be the love and beauty that would meet her in the end.

...Sometimes the most painful chapters of our lives —- are the most meaningful chapters of our lives.

...Suffering asks us to ultimately bear under that which is ultimately not under our control — which proves we are ultimately not the ones in control.

...Suffering quietly begs us to surrender — so we can win a greater wisdom, a deeper strength, a closer intimacy.

If suffering is about bearing under — suffering is a call for us all to be a community to stand together and carry the weight of bearing under — only to find that we are all being carried by a Greater Love.

...Suffering is a call to come, to show up, to be there. Suffering can be a gift because it’s a call for presence; it’s a call for us to be present.

...Where there is suffering, there is God. And where there is God, there is redemption.

...It’s our living well that determines our dying well.

Kara sang with her babies and loved them large and relentlessly beyond the limits of herself, and was present and insisted that suffering didn’t mean the absence of goodness but rather the presence of God, and she fought to stay tender and keep a soft heart and let the echo of her laughter live long in all their souls….

...No one wants to die; life is a luminous gift that we get to take with unabashed joy instead of taking it for granted.

...While Kara escapes winter, and crosses our minds and hearts like that robin that’s a fluttering of wings just past the edge of our eyes: singing of lovely things coming, coming — just before it flies away, lovely and gone.

Just before we too will soon feel His warming Love directly on our faces —

soon, soon.
Read more here.

Sometimes we should try the difficult, rather than the easy path

Seth Godin writes,
When we intentionally seek out the difficult tasks, we're much more likely to actually create value.
Read more here.


Who can excite the base, and also bring new people into the party?

$8,000,000,000 spent in 2012 on bikinis

Worn for power? Objects to be used? Can modesty be brought back? Can dignity be revealed?
How will you use your beauty?

Thanks to Scott Ott

Oh, and Chateau Heartiste asks, "Can you spot the beta male?"

Is Ted Cruz another Barry Goldwater?

In my last posts I speculated about how the media will treat Ted Cruz. I excerpted from this article by Harry Enten at FiveThirtyEight. One of the things Enten said was:
And the Cruz hatred doesn’t stop at the edges of the Senate cloakroom. Influential party actors dislike him, too. I can’t remember another Republican who united Ann Coulter, Pat Robertson, Jennifer Rubin and Thomas Sowell in opposition.

Thomas Sowell is someone I respect greatly. Here is what he said about Cruz:
Senator Ted Cruz has not yet reached the point where he can make policy, rather than just make political trouble. But there are already disquieting signs that he is looking out for Ted Cruz — even if that sets back the causes he claims to be serving.

Those causes are not being served when Senator Cruz undermines the election chances of the only political party that has any chance of undoing the disasters that Barack Obama has already inflicted on the nation — and forestalling new disasters that are visible on the horizon.
Read more here.

Here is what Ann Coulter says.

Here is what Pat Robertson says.

Here is what Jennifer Rubin says.

Fighting against the odds

I have been thinking about the treatment Ted Cruz is about to get from the media. So has Harry Enten at FiveThirtyEight:
First, Cruz doesn’t have enough support from party bigwigs. To win the Republican or Democratic nomination, you need the backing of at least some of the party apparatus. At a minimum, your fellow party members shouldn’t hate you. Otherwise, you end up getting the Newt Gingrich 2012 treatment. That is, you get pounced on the moment you’re seen as a threat to win the nomination.

Four national live interview polls taken since December have tested Cruz in a matchup against Hillary Clinton. In each one of these polls, Cruz has done the worst of any of the possible 2016 Republican nominees. In fact, he’s trailed by an average of 5 percentage points more than the average Republican tested: CNN/Opinion Research Corp (at 6 percentage points), Marist College (at 5 percentage points), Quinnipiac University (at 3 percentage points) and Selzer (at 5 percentage points).
Read more here.

Pulling out all the stops

Is there any doubt the media will be coming after Ted Cruz now with everything they've got?
Scrappleface sets the table here.

It's not the easy way, but it is the effective way to better your lot in life

Scott Ott has a wonderful piece at PJ Media about Booker T. Washington.
These United States of America were built by men like Booker T. Washington — at first by their muscles, under compulsion, then later by their minds and hearts, freely given.

He quotes from Washington's book Up From Slavery:
"I early learned that it is a hard matter to convert an individual by abusing him..."

“I have learned,” he said, “that success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has had to overcome while trying to succeed.”
Read more here.

Yesterday I wrote a post defending Saul Alinsky. I wrote the post to counter some of the negative things I read about him by conservative pundits. It is guilt by association: because Obama and Hillary use some of Alinsky's tactics to promote their own rise to power, when the truth is that Alinsky was trying to empower people who were exploited and discriminated against.

Booker T. Washington had a better approach: teaching people to read, to take individual responsibility for their lives, and not to wallow in victimhood.
Update: Here is the moving video of Scott telling us about Booker T. Washington:

Monday, March 23, 2015


It is a time for truth. It is a time for liberty. It is a time to reclaim the Constitution of the United States. It is a time for the media to attack a conservative with everything they've got!

My one encounter with Saul Alinsky

I think it is time to write another post in defense of Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky was a hero of mine for a time in the 1960s. First, some background.

I came of age in the 1960s. Just as it was in 2008, change was in the air all throughout the 1960s. Young Americans wanted to be involved in changing things. Folk singers like Peter, Paul and Mary, Pete Seeger, Joan Baez, and Bob Dylan inspired us. The assassination of JFK rocked us. Some of us wanted to overcome against racial discrimination. Some of us wanted to stop communism. Some just wanted to give the middle finger to the establishment, smoke pot, have sex, and run to Canada to avoid the draft.

I was raised in a conservative Republican family whose hero was Dwight David Eisenhower. Growing up in Iowa my family had great respect for the farmers who grew things. I knew no blacks, but my hero was a black basketball player. Dwight Eisenhower brought to our attention the fact that there was discrimination against blacks. It was he, remember, who sent troops into Arkansas to make sure that black children could go to Little Rock High School.

I won an athletic scholarship to attend Hardin-Simmons University in Abilene, Texas. It was a school operated by the Southern Baptist Convention. I had been raised in the Methodist church. My dad was an usher. It was a very conservative, somber place where we attended every Sunday. When I got to Texas, I started to attend Baptist churches. I was amazed at the joyous singing. People really seemed to love Jesus Christ and want to follow Him. I did, too. I was baptized and immersed myself in learning about the Bible and Jesus. I took Koine Greek, the language of the New Testament, as my foreign language.

To be a follower of Christ is to be radicalized. You get a different set of values. You become interested in serving others. You know a joy that permeates your life. You see things that are wrong, and you want to change them. You ask questions. One of Saul Alinsky's trademark ideas is a question mark turned upside down into a plowshare that upends settled soil. Why are there no blacks in our churches, I asked. Why are there no blacks on the basketball team? Why are there separate drinking fountains?

I enrolled in Army ROTC and completed my first two years. When my mom found out I wanted to take the advance courses in my junior and senior years, she, unbeknownst to me, contacted our family pediatrician who had treated me for severe allergies as a child. He wrote a letter to the draft board, and I was classified 4F, making me ineligible for the draft. I continued on to graduate with a B.A. degree in psychology, with a minor in history. I was elected President of the Baptist Student Union and won an award at graduation as the outstanding male graduate.

My first job out of college was as a caseworker in a child welfare department. At night I would watch the national news on television. Two topics dominated the national news, Viet Nam, and Civil Rights. Although Walter Cronkite is remembered as America's anchorman, my favorites were Chet Huntley and David Brinkley. I particularly liked Brinkley's sense of humor. However, at coffee the next morning if I would mention something I saw the night before on the Huntley-Brinkley Report, my supervisors would caution me not to watch "Frontley-Pinkley." (Frontley stood for "Communist front", and Pinkley also stood for Communist).

Then, there was the stunning assassination of JFK in Dallas. The Dallas Morning News reported that some Texans actually celebrated. I wanted out. I made plans to go to graduate school at The University of Kansas, a nice kind of halfway point compromise between Iowa and Texas.

As I began my studies to earn a Masters degree in Social Work, I learned that in that profession there were three pathways of emphasis. One was working with individual clients as a kind of junior psychiatrist. Another was to work with groups of clients. A third was community organizing. I didn't see myself as a junior psychiatrist, so I gravitated toward the groupwork and community organizing pathways.

During my second year I had a field placement at an elementary school. The principal referred to me every student who was considered by him to be a behavior problem. Instead of working one-on-one with the students, I worked with them as a group, and also with their parents. We put on a play for the school on Abe Lincoln's birthday. The baddest, biggest, blackest kid in the school was Abe Lincoln. Later in the year, a girl in the group won the school spelling bee. None of the kids' parents had ever been involved with the school, but they did begin to get involved.

After earning my Master of Social Work degree, my first job was Director of a counseling center in the Kansas City, Kansas ghetto. The funding came from LBJ's War on Poverty. My office was located in a Lutheran Church, then later in a Catholic school. The civil rights movement was in full sway. While Martin Luther King led the movement in the South, Saul Alinsky did so in the North, from Rochester, New York to Chicago, to Kansas City, to California.

Martin Luther King was assassinated. The ghettoes erupted in violence. Non-violence gave way to Black Power. On the one year anniversary of King's assassination, my wife and I crossed the bridge over to Kansas City, Missouri to go out to dinner. A police car pulled us over. We waited for a long time for the officer to get out of his car. When he finally did, he informed me that he would have to take me to the jail and book me. I asked why? He said because I had accumulated a ton of parking tickets. I told him that was not true. Then I remembered: I had cosigned for a black teen to purchase a car. The car was in my name. The boy was the son of one of my workers at the counseling center.

This was the second and last time in my life I was booked into a jail. The first time was when one day in high school a kid named Mohammed Sadden had greeted me one morning and informed me that my girlfriend was a "slut." I swung at him and we scuffled for a while before agreeing to meet each other across the street on the lawn of the Lutheran Church after school. We did, along with most of the spectating student body, and the cops were called, after about 20 minutes of our brawl.

Back to Kansas City. After being booked into jail, I was put in a "bullpen," with about fifteen other guys. A cop brought in an inebriated black man, then wound up and punched the man as hard as he could right in the gut. I asked another officer if it was true that a person could get one phone call. He said yes. I called a Methodist minister who I knew was counseling Chief of Police Kelly on how to deal with groups like the Black Panthers. He called the Chief, I was released, and the cop who slugged the inebriated black man was fired a few days later.

The Methodist minister was one of a coalition of Christian ministers who had invited Saul Alinsky to come to Kansas City. One of the main reasons was to help the community deal with incidents of police brutality. Word got out about my experience witnessing police brutality, and the man himself, Saul Alinsky, wanted to meet me. I invited him to my house for dinner, spent a very enjoyable evening talking with him, and drove him back to his hotel.

Saul Alinsky was all about the least of these, the discriminated against, the ones Jesus wanted to reach. Alinsky was about empowering people, getting them to stand up for themselves. Unlike Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who studied Alinsky's tactics and used them to promote themselves and their own agendas, Alinsky was about empowering poor people. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have used Alinsky's tactics to make Republicans the enemy. Alinsky would come into a community, find out who was most hated, such as a Chief of Police, a Superintendent of Schools, a County Commissioner, and then purposely make himself the enemy of that hated person, thereby gaining the trust of the people he was trying to organize. Invariably, he was invited by coalitions of Christians; Catholics and protestants united, unlike Obama's promotion of ties with Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian mullahs. Alinsky died a few years after my one evening with him, and that was my last and only contact with him.

Often I read various conservative pundits writing about Alinsky. They make him out to be evil. He was not. He was a man who loved and stood with and for the least of these, the exploited and the discriminated against. Because Obama and Hillary studied his tactics and used them to promote their own rises to power, Alinsky is considered guilty by association. It isn't fair.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Don't stop working, eat well, exercise, and don't stop looking for a new girlfriend

"I'd like to show that one can learn something new at any age in life."

thanks to Ann Voskamp

Potato chips joy

Thanks to Ann Voskamp

Rationality: an alternative solution to Obama's Iran policies

Andrew McCarthy notes that
History, after all, gets revised so that those who write it can appear to have been on the right side of it.

...One must clarify whether we’re talking about when a Democratic administration was bombing a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan because it was really a joint chemical-weapons venture between Iraq and al-Qaeda; or when that Democratic administration joined Congress in making regime change in Baghdad the national policy of the United States; or when congressional Democrats insisted on voting to show their support for the war to remove Saddam Hussein from power; or when Democrats decided Iraq had nothing to do with al-Qaeda after all; or, finally, when Democrats turned with a vengeance against the Iraq war they had enthusiastically supported.

...Yet, what is the president’s rationale for appeasing Iran with a disastrous deal that will enable it to become a nuclear-weapons power? It is that the only alternative to his bad deal is war.

...Iran, like Saddam’s Iraq, cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons because it is a rogue aggressor that promotes jihadist terrorism, aspires to hegemony, and serially violates its international obligations. Consequently, the U.S. national interest is that Iran’s revolutionary regime, which has killed thousands of Americans and made opposition to America its ne plus ultra for 36 years, be — as Obama is fond of saying with respect to ISIS — degraded and ultimately defeated.

...Democrats have been telling us for years that there is a smart way to do this, a way that does not call for a false choice between surrender or war. According to their “Iraq in a box” model, the administration needs to work with Congress to codify regime change as the unambiguous national policy of the United States. With that long-term goal as our compass, crippling economic sanctions must be restored and enhanced — and enforced without waiver — in order to cut off the regime’s access to the international banking system and curtail its ability to engage in commerce, especially the marketing of its oil and related products. Other countries that do business with Iran and abet its efforts to defeat the sanctions should find their own capacity to conduct business in our markets and those of our allies significantly diminished.

Actors within the long reach of our enforcement jurisdiction should be prosecuted if they trade with or materially support Iran and its agents (such as the Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah). Iran itself needs to be put on notice that all options are on the table, including military attack, in response to its abetting of jihadist organizations and its refusal to dismantle its nuclear program. In the meantime, economic and logistical support for Iran’s dissidents should be substantially stepped up.

...Very simply, it should be made obvious in word and deed that we take the regime’s “Death to America” rhetoric and actions deadly seriously, that we believe the sole rational response is to treat the regime as the incorrigible enemy that it is. Iran is not the Soviet empire; it is no match for determined American opposition on the world stage. Negotiating with it as if it were is a damaging error that empowers the mullahs when they should be forced to play the weak hand they actually have.
Read more here.

The definition of insanity

Do you want to define insanity? How about negotiating with the country ruled by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who said in a speech yesterday,
Death to America, because America is the original source of this pressure.”
Read more here.

Ted Cruz to announce tomorrow

Senator Ted Cruz is going to announce his run for the GOP presidential nomination tomorrow at Liberty University. See how many biased statements are made against him in this article by Sarah Pulliam Bailey in the Washington Post. Do you remember the media blasting Barack Obama this way when he announced he was running for the 2008 Democrat nomination? I don't.

One of Bailey's most hilarious efforts at slamming Cruz was when she wrote this convoluted sentence:
Cruz’s views might reflect evangelicals in the pews than he would reflect many in leadership.
I think she meant to say Cruz reflects the views of Christians in the pews, but not necessarily evangelical leaders. Oh, you mean he represents we, the people? Mustn't have that now must we?

The sky's the limit!

Friday, March 20, 2015

Want to be ventilated? - Tulsa, OK - News, Weather, Video and Sports - |
Thanks to The Blaze

UN Commission on the Status of Women is a total sham

Anne Bayefsky writes a scathing indictment of the UN’s top women’s rights body, the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) at Fox News.

Woman lures pregnant woman on Craigs List; gets her to come to her house to look at baby clothes, cuts baby out of woman's womb, pretends it is hers. Baby dies. Pregnant woman still alive. Attacker had a 19 month old son who died in shallow waters of a swimming pool.

A harrowing story out of Longmont, Colorado today:

Read more here.
Longmont is in "progressive" Boulder County, where babies in wombs are not considered to be human beings.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Male and female hypergamy

Chateau Heartiste asserts,
...women have a real aversion to failing to absolutely maximize the return on their sexual value.

...Female Hypergamy is both Brahma the Creator and SHIVa the Destroyer. Women’s leashed sexuality births empires; women’s unleashed sexuality desiccates civilizations. We are well past the birthing stage of America and well into the barren womb stage.

...In secular, sex egalitarian, established civilizations like the West, the great anti-feminist truth may be that Male Hypergamy — the desire of men for ever prettier and younger women, and the ability of HMMV men to fulfill that desire — will be the heart matter force that saves the advanced cultures from navel-gazing themselves into oblivion.
I think HMMV stands for High Male Market Value. Read more here.

A woman who feels and expresses her love for God so beautifully

Ann Voskamp writes about her recent trip to Iraq, via Israel. At the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem,
When I run my hands across the carved wood of the doors, the surrendered wood, you can feel the engraving of time and hopes and fears, how they make their way into the crevices, run into the lowest places.

Turns out that when God comes to this sod, visits this planet, He doesn’t come the expected way: God doesn’t enter our lives through the most esteemed place — but through the most accessible place….

...when you bend low through that door and you kneel down and touch the place where the Maker of the Heavens delivered Himself into earth, where the Creator of the Cosmos birthed Himself as a creature…

...You’re crushed by unfathomable grace.

God is with us.

God was one of us.

God walked this sod, pressed His holy heel into the earth, let His divinity fill a container of skin and filled His lungs with all our atmosphere of ache.

We aren’t alone in this mess. Us on this pale blue dot of a planet in the vast blackness of the cosmos — we are the visited planet. He came. He sees. He knows. We are not alone. God is with us.

...This busted-up, warring world will taste resurrection, not because of people stepping up in front of news cameras or spotlights or spout their soundbites — but because of people who step down into the shadows to be the light of Christ.

This bleeding, broken planet will taste healing not because more of us tried to climb ladders to be seen — but more of us went lower and saw the face of Christ in those who are too often unseen.

In the sanctuary Ann comes into contact with a woman mopping the floors of the church:
And here is this exquisite woman with her bent back and humble mop in the place where God first touched this sod, first let his loud cry mingle with humanity.

And I’m a kneeled mess and can’t stop weeping, my shoulders moving with the breaking of my heart over the beauty and rightness of her lowly offering right where He Himself came low and offered Himself.

The woman leans her mop up against a pew.

She steps in close toward me. And she cups my face in her wrinkled, warm hands.

And she gently kisses my one wet cheek — and on my other wet cheek.

There’s hope in our hells when we become like Jesus to each other.

I don’t understand the thickness of the foreign words she murmurs over me, but I know how this communion makes me feel, and she holds me up as my repentance breaks right open and falls like rain.

She’s like my Mary who kisses the unlikely with this fragrance of His love —

anointing me for my own going lower and dying.
Read more and see Ann's photos here.

Long-term consequences

Heather Barwick is a woman who was raised by lesbian parents. She is now the mother of four children. At The Federalist she writes an open letter to the gay community, explaining why she does not support gay marriage.
Growing up, and even into my 20s, I supported and advocated for gay marriage. It’s only with some time and distance from my childhood that I’m able to reflect on my experiences and recognize the long-term consequences that same-sex parenting had on me. And it’s only now, as I watch my children loving and being loved by their father each day, that I can see the beauty and wisdom in traditional marriage and parenting.

...I grew up surrounded by women who said they didn’t need or want a man. Yet, as a little girl, I so desperately wanted a daddy. It is a strange and confusing thing to walk around with this deep-down unquenchable ache for a father, for a man, in a community that says that men are unnecessary.

Gay marriage doesn’t just redefine marriage, but also parenting. It promotes and normalizes a family structure that necessarily denies us something precious and foundational. It denies us something we need and long for, while at the same time tells us that we don’t need what we naturally crave. That we will be okay. But we’re not. We’re hurting.

Kids of divorced parents are allowed to say, “Hey, mom and dad, I love you, but the divorce crushed me and has been so hard. It shattered my trust and made me feel like it was my fault. It is so hard living in two different houses.” Kids of adoption are allowed to say, “Hey, adoptive parents, I love you. But this is really hard for me. I suffer because my relationship with my first parents was broken. I’m confused and I miss them even though I’ve never met them.”

But children of same-sex parents haven’t been given the same voice. It’s not just me. There are so many of us. Many of us are too scared to speak up and tell you about our hurt and pain, because for whatever reason it feels like you’re not listening. That you don’t want to hear. If we say we are hurting because we were raised by same-sex parents, we are either ignored or labeled a hater.

This isn’t about hate at all. I know you understand the pain of a label that doesn’t fit and the pain of a label that is used to malign or silence you. And I know that you really have been hated and that you really have been hurt. I was there, at the marches, when they held up signs that said, “God hates fags” and “AIDS cures homosexuality.” I cried and turned hot with anger right there in the street with you. But that’s not me. That’s not us.

I know this is a hard conversation. But we need to talk about it. If anyone can talk about hard things, it’s us. You taught me that.
Read more here.

University President uses politically incorrect language

Janet Napolitano. Remember her? Now she is President of the University of California. She got caught using politically incorrect language when students protested during a meeting of the regents. Nanette Asimov reports at SF Gate:
University of California President Janet Napolitano apologized Thursday for referring to a student protest as “crap” during a meeting of the UC regents a day earlier in San Francisco. Her comment to regents Chairman Bruce Varner was captured on the university’s video stream.

“I was caught on a mike with a word that was unfortunate. So I want to just say I apologize for that,” Napolitano said at the start of the final day of the three-day regents meeting at UC’s Mission Bay campus.

Napolitano made her original remark when a few dozen student protesters got loud at Wednesday’s regents meeting.

The students were protesting not only the tuition hike set for next fall, but a new campus in Richmond being planned by UC Berkeley.
Read more here.

My way or the highway

Daniel Henninger writes in the Wall Street Journal,
Presidents Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan all submitted major arms-control treaties and agreements for Senate approval. They did so to give their work political credibility with the American people and indeed the world. But somehow Mr. Obama believes he has an exemption from the basics of U.S. politics. So we wake up one day to find he is substituting the judgment of the Security Council, with such famous allies as Russia and China, for consent from the U.S. Senate. Result: an arms deal as politically flaccid as ObamaCare.

After the Affordable Care Act became a one-party law, many governors refused to participate. A mirror-image opt-out from the Iran deal is emerging now among the most significant nations of the Middle East.

...Whether in domestic or foreign policy, Mr. Obama’s modus operandi is the same: Structure the issue as a choice between what he wants to do and an unacceptable extreme. The result, not surprisingly, is to choke off any possibility of building useful political coalitions from the outset.

With health care, the whole of GOP alternatives was “nothing new.” With Iran, it’s Mr. Obama’s deal or a “rush to war.” You get two political options: Salute or shut up.

...No serious person can be shocked if what happens after the Iran nuclear agreement looks a lot like the ObamaCare rollout—a shambles of half-done details. With ObamaCare, America’s courts and bureaucracies are available to clean up the mess. But you may not like the cleanup crew that shows up for the ObamaCare of arms-control deals.
Read more here.

Wednesday, March 18, 2015


Found here.

Avalanche season

It is avalanche season in Colorado. If you see one coming, what would you do? This guy just ignores it and decides it's a perfect time for a back flip.

Found here.

If not now, when?

Seth Godin prods us into thinking about taking charge of our lives.
Along for the ride

Like the pilot says, "sit back, relax, and enjoy the flight."

When you're on one of those Disneyland boats, it takes you where Disney wants you to go. That's why you got on. And so you are lulled, a spectator, merely a tourist.

So different, isn't it, from driving yourself, choosing your own route and owning what comes of it?

How long have you been along for the ride? When is your turn to actually drive?

"She reminds me of me when I'm shopping with my wife"

That's how Greg Gutfeld described Hillary's performance at her UN press conference.

What would you do?

Cuba's military

Did you know that Cuba's senior military officers
are in charge of sugar production, tourism, import-export, information technology and communications, civil aviation and cigar production?
James Bruno was the State Department’s former representative to negotiations with Cuba’s military, and he shares today at Politico his insights gained from that experience. Cuba's military establishment is the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias, or FAR.

Bruno writes,
Under Raúl Castro’s leadership from 1959 until he succeeded brother Fidel as president in 2006, the now 60,000-strong military has been widely considered to be Cuba’s best managed and stablest official entity. Furthermore, it has never been called upon to fire on or suppress Cuban citizens, even during the so-called Maleconazo protests in 1994, and most observers believe the FAR would refuse any orders to do so.

Former CIA Cuba analyst Brian Latell believes the pragmatic-oriented FAR will be easier to deal with than the old-guard civilian leaders.

“The generals will either dominate a praetorian successor regime after Fidel Castro dies or is incapacitated, or, like the militaries in the former communist countries of Eastern Europe, be the willing accomplices in the demise of Marxism,” according to Latell.

The end of Soviet subsidies also led the FAR to expand into non-military-related economic activities in order to help pay for defense outlays as well as to fund the civilian side of government. It has focused its efforts on three key sectors: agriculture, manufacturing and tourism. Many high-ranking active and retired FAR officers subsequently have turned into “entrepreneur soldiers,” i.e., olive-drab businessmen in charge of large, hard-currency-earning industries, all controlled by GAESA, headed by Raúl’s son-in-law, Luis Alberto Rodríguez, an Army brigadier who speaks English with an impeccable upper-class British accent.
Read more here.

Thanks to Betsy Newmark

Heroic Iranian dissidents confront Obama

Adam Kredo reports at the Washington Free Beacon about two letters that have recently sent to the White House by imprisoned heroic Iranian dissidents. The letters criticize Obama for ignoring human rights in Iran, while he negotiates with the mullahs.
“In 2009 when the people of Iran loudly and clearly asked for your support for their freedom and sovereignty, you ignored us and empowered the tyrants to imprison, torture, and kill us.”
Read more here.
I agree with Betsy Newmark, who observes,
Think of both the physical and moral courage it takes to sign on to such a letter while a political prisoner. What a shameful moment in our nation's foreign policy.

Is Iran a reliable negotiating partner?

Jonah Goldberg leads off his column at National Review today with this:
It has been an Iranian tradition since 1979 to end Friday prayers with chants of “Death to America!” In a purely rational world, that would be all one needed to know that Iran is not a reliable negotiating partner. Alas, we do not live in such a world. But there’s more evidence. Iran, according to our State Department, has been the chief exporter of terrorism for the last three decades. It has worked closely with al-Qaeda, facilitating its attacks on America and our allies. Most of the September 11 hijackers traveled through Iran with the help of the Iranian government. U.S. judges have ruled that Iran was an accomplice in the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in East Africa and the September 11 attacks. During the Iraq War, Iran was responsible for numerous American deaths.

Jonah goes on here to explain why the Cotton letter was "inconvenient."

Thanks to Betsy Newmark

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Pregnant women beware!

This Friday we experience a solar eclipse, supermoon, and Spring equinox. Andrew Griffin explains in the Independent,

As the eclipse plunges the UK and other places into darkness this Friday, two other rare if less spectacular celestial events will be taking place, too: a Supermoon and the Spring equinox.

A Supermoon, or perigee moon, happens when the full or new moon does its closest fly-by of the Earth, making it look bigger than it normally does. And the spring equinox refers to the time of the year when the day and night are of equal duration, mid-way between the longest and shortest days.

The solar eclipse refers to a phenomenon where the sun and moon line up, so that the latter obscures the former. And while it won’t be affected by the two other events, it is rare that the three events happen even individually.
Read more here.

"Jihad, Jihad"

A passenger jet left Dulles for Denver today. A man on board began yelling "Jihad, Jihad," as he ran toward the cockpit. Passengers subdued him, and the plane turned back to Dulles. A passenger filmed the incident with his cell phone and uploaded it to You Tube.

Read more here.

Thanks to Complete Colorado.

Obstruction of Justice

It is a crime — obstruction of justice — to destroy even one message to prevent it from being subpoenaed.
so writes Ronald Rotunda in the Wall Street Journal.
...When Congress subpoenaed Mrs. Clinton’s official communications, or when nongovernmental organizations filed Freedom of Information Act requests for the same, the State Department could not turn over her emails because it did not have them.

...By her own admission, Mrs. Clinton destroyed more than 30,000 emails once the subpoenas started coming in.

...How did those reviewing the emails define “personal”? For instance, if Mrs. Clinton had emailed a foreign government about a donation to the Clinton Foundation, was that message—whatever its interest to watchdogs or voters—tossed in the trash bin?

...The law says that no one has to use email, but it is a crime (18 U.S.C. section 1519) to destroy even one message to prevent it from being subpoenaed. Prosecutors charging someone with obstruction don’t even have to establish that any investigation was pending or under way when the deletion took place.

...Legal commentators call this “anticipatory obstruction of justice,” and the law punishes it with up to 20 years imprisonment. The burden of proof is light.

...In addition, rules governing the practice of law forbid attorneys from anticipatory obstruction of justice. These ethics rules are drafted by the American Bar Association, but they are also reflected in real law. Virtually every state court adopts them, and violation can lead to disbarment. Rule 3.4 (which has been around for many years) provides that an attorney shall not unlawfully “conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value.” Mrs. Clinton is a lawyer governed by these rules. So are any attorneys who advised her to delete her emails.

When the Senate Watergate Committee discovered that President Richard Nixon had a very extensive inventory of White House tapes, both the committee and the special prosecutor subpoenaed them. At the time, some wondered why Mr. Nixon, a lawyer before entering politics, didn’t simply destroy the tapes. The answer was that doing so could have led Mr. Nixon to an indictment for obstruction as well as disbarment.

At the time, I was assistant majority counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee, so I remember that period well. Mrs. Clinton should remember it too: She worked on the House Impeachment Committee, which warned Nixon not to destroy the tapes.

Here’s another reason Mrs. Clinton should know about obstruction: Congress enacted section 1519, making the crime easier to prove, in 2002, as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As senator, she voted for the law.
Read more here.

Who are more likely to vote Republican, white Catholics or white protestants?

Which group of voters do you think are more solidly in the Republican camp, white Catholics, or white protestants?. Patricia Miller writes at Salon,
According to the most recent polling from the Pew Research Center, 53 percent of white Catholics now favor the GOP, versus 39 percent who favor the Democrats—the largest point spread in the history of the Pew poll. And for the first time, white Catholics are more Republican than the voting group usually considered the ultimate Republicans: white Protestants (a designation that includes both mainline and evangelical Protestants).
Read more here.
Thanks to Betsy Newmark

Are we prepared? No!

What would it be like to be attacked by a nuclear bomb? Glenn Reynolds reprises an article he wrote in 2011 for The Atlantic:
...Encouraging people to take even modest steps to prepare themselves in advance will undoubtedly save lives, even if the terrorist attack never comes and Washington is, instead, struck by an asteroid, an earthquake, or a hurricane. As we head into a 21st century that appears to be a lot less secure than 1990s prognostications suggested, it's probably best to prepare for the worst.
Go here to read some of the important considerations.

Benghazi timeline

Byron York reports on a timeline compiled by the Benghazi committee:
When did the House Select Committee on Benghazi first learn that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton kept a secret email system? When did the State Department finally turn over even some of those emails to investigators? When did State first admit it didn't even possess all the former secretary's documents? That information, and more, is contained in a timeline created by the Benghazi committee as investigators seek to piece together just what the Obama administration did in response to House requests for information about the September 11, 2012 terror attack that left four Americans dead.
One of the things the timeline shows is that Chairman Gowdy has known since last summer that Secretary Clinton was using a non-governmental email address.
Read the timeline here.
thanks to Instapundit

Why Netanyahu may win?

thanks to Instapundit

Waiting in the wings

Glenn Reynolds doesn't think any other Democrat can match what Hillary has to offer: "a combination of condescension, evasiveness, and faux-populism." Nevertheless, Glenn links to this article featuring 21 other Democrats who might consider running in 2016, if Hillary backs out.

What a local radio station can do

One Denver radio station put together what they call a "liberty lineup." Attorney Randy Corporon leads off in the early morning hours, followed by nationally syndicated Laura Ingraham, then Ken Clark, John Rush, and Kris Cook. Those four local personalities, although very knowledgeable about national issues, have really stepped forward to become involved in developing grassroots participation by liberty-minded listeners to their respective programs. I believe radio station KLZ is responsible to a large degree for the recent victory by the grassroots in the state Republican Party Central Committee elections, which I wrote about here. They are not merely talkers. They put themselves out there to connect with citizens who want to see our country return to its constitutional roots. Kudos to the liberty lineup!