We examine emergency room admissions related to these bacteria in the wake of the San Francisco ban. We find that ER visits spiked when the ban went into effect. Relative to other counties, ER admissions increase by at least one fourth, and deaths exhibit a similar increase.
The results really should not be all that surprising. As Businessweek reports, prior research found that few people regularly wash reusable grocery bags or take other precautionary steps (such as using separate bags for meat and produce). So, not surprisingly, tests find coliform and even e.coli bacteria in a significant percentage of bags.
Additionally, Clarice cites this from Lance Christiansen writing in Reason,
the bags contribute little to solid waste, are not a major cause of blocked storm drains, and that the “county’s own studies showed that litter actually increased” when the bags were banned.Read more here.
Further, the Department of Public Health has warned, “During the warmer months, the increased temperatures can promote the growth of bacteria that may be present on [reusable] bags.”
They encourage users to wash their reusable bags “frequently.” This of course consumes water -- and if the advice were followed rigorously, “reusable” bags would consume as much as 40 times more water than lightweight plastic bags.
Some dismiss this advice, bragging that they never wash their bags. In those cases, they are putting themselves and other consumers at risk as bacteria spreads easily in shopping carts and at checkout counters.
Additionally, our research demonstrated enormous direct and indirect costs on California’s consumers. If California’s 12.4 million households spend five minutes each week cleaning their shopping bags to get rid of germs and bacteria, the annual opportunity cost would be more than $1.5 billion.
The bag ban is likely to disproportionately burden the working poor and those households on a tight budget.
No comments:
Post a Comment