Mike Flynn writes at Breitbart.com, "If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will
loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter,
somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and
accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men
and women of our military."
On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National
Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike
down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the
military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no
discernible rational basis."
Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until
the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to
do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no
discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the
demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their
sworn duty."
Read more here: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting
Via Instapundit
1 comment:
I keep wondering if Beck is right. He claims there is a conspiracy to commit voter fraud in place with civil unrest to the point that martial law has to be called in certain places thus disfranchising a lot of votes. I just can't help but wonder if that's where this is going.
Post a Comment