Intrepid researchers understand the schemes at FBI and DOJ

At The Conservative Treehouse, Sundance writes,

The prior use of FBI and NSA networks for metadata exploitation and political surveillance is what underlines all of the current activity taking place within the current political battle. Peel all of the layers of investigative schemes, intelligence deception, false and distracting media narratives -including Mueller- and what lies beneath it all is the weaponized use of database-collected material for political surveillance and exploitation.

It really is that simple.

Seriously. Every motive and every action and reaction is directly connected to the need to hide what was taking place in 2015 and 2016 between officials within the DOJ, FBI and U.S. intelligence community, and outside government “contractors” (Fusion GPS, Crowdstrike etc.) who were political operatives. Everything boils down to the common denominator of the abuse of the intelligence apparatus for political power.

There are a few intrepid researchers who have a solid understanding of the scheme, and more importantly all of the activity that has taken place in the FBI and DOJ-NSD effort to hide that scheme. Over at Marketswork: Jeff has a terrific timeline where he takes the latest Mueller Russian indictment claims, and overlays the FISA matrix. here.

Here are some excerpts from Jeff Carlson at themarketswork.com.

...Recall, the DNC famously refused to allow the FBI to examine their servers – which has always seemed more than a bit odd.

If the DNC had definitive proof of Russian hacking, one would expect a standing invitation to examine the evidence. Instead, they have protected those servers from any outside examination.

...By June 2016, Russia had stolen thousands of DNC documents and emails.

...Julian Assange has repeatedly noted that Russia was not his source:

We can say, we have said, repeatedly over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.

WikiLeaks has never been proven wrong in any of its releases or statements.

Read more here.