Showing posts with label MLK Jr.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MLK Jr.. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2020

It's only a matter of time!



From the satirical Babylon Bee:
U.S.—A dangerous, far-right extremist has suggested that we treat people of all races equally, shocked and horrified sources confirmed Friday.

The hateful bigot has been canceled for his controversial comments that people should be treated with respect no matter their skin color.

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character," said the dangerous, alt-right extremist, according to sources. "I have a dream that one day little black boys and girls will be holding hands with little white boys and girls.”

The offensive comments were platformed at large protests and marches, and everyone associated with the problematic racist has also been canceled.

"I mean, this is literally Nazism," said one progressive Twitter user. "He might as well have grown out a little mustache and invaded Russia. We are scouring his old Facebook photos for swastikas and racial slurs as we speak. I'm sure there's a ton of hateful stuff there."

Monday, January 20, 2020

In honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

On this day honoring Martin Luther King Jr., let's read his famous letter from a Birmingham Jail. He wrote it to eight Alabama Christian and Jewish clergy who had expressed in a statement that they deplored the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham for which Dr. King had been arrested and incarcerated.

It is a powerful and moving letter. If you have never read it, I recommend it highly. You can read it here.

Monday, January 13, 2020

Letter from a Birmingham jail

Martin Luther King Jr. Day is next Monday, January 20. I decided today to read his famous letter King had written from a Birmingham Jail. He wrote it to eight Alabama Christian and Jewish clergy who had expressed in a statement that they deplored the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham for which Dr. King had been arrested and incarcerated.

It is a powerful and moving letter. If you have never read it, you can read it here.

Friday, June 07, 2019

How modern diversity training betrays Dr. King's vision

Martin Luther King Jr. got some bad publicity this week regarding his sexual behavior. Why do we revere him? ChloƩ Valdary writes in City Journal,
King sought to defeat injustice by embracing love over hatred.

Underpinning King’s philosophy was his belief in the sanctity of the individual and the “amazing potential for goodness” within human beings. “We do not wish to triumph over the white community,” he wrote. “That would only result in transferring those now on the bottom to the top. But, if we can live up to nonviolence in thought and deed, there will emerge an interracial society based on freedom for all.”

Unfortunately, most major institutions’ diversity and inclusion programs ignore these lessons and betray King’s vision. Robin Di Angelo, an academic and diversity consultant who counts Amazon, Unilever, the YMCA, and the City of Oakland, among others, as clients, coined the term “white fragility,” calling it “inevitable” that whites are racist.

...In “The Current Crisis in Race Relations,” King wrote that “the important thing about a man is not the color of his skin or the texture of his hair but the texture and quality of his soul.” For Di Angelo, no distinction exists between skin and soul. She and other purveyors of such thinking embrace a reductive and repellent vision of racial guilt.

...What is the aim of diversity and inclusion training? Should it embrace the beloved community and its transcendent vision of human beings working through conflict—racial or otherwise? Or should it bring about a hierarchical inversion, in which one group of people is favored over another, which is perpetually castigated for sins, real or imagined? How we answer this question may shape our institutions, and the workplace, for decades to come.
Read more here.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

FBI takes down Martin Luther King Jr.

Why is it that when something sensational happens in America the publications bringing us the story are British? Most often it is the Daily Mail. Today it is also Standpoint and the Sunday Times, two other British publications. Author David Garrow, who has written several books on Martin Luther King Jr. claims that there are
secret FBI tapes that accuse Martin Luther King Jr of having extramarital affairs with '40 to 45 women' and even claim he 'looked on and laughed' as a pastor friend raped a parishioner.
Read more here.

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Monday, January 15, 2018

Guess who else has been the victim of illicit FBI or DOJ investigations?

At a site called Muckrock, J Pat Brown reveals that
1977 report found the FBI had engaged in gross misconduct while surveilling Martin Luther King, Jr.
Independent review of the Bureau’s assassination investigation uncovered extent of illegal counterintelligence program

In January of 1977, FBI director Clarence M. Kelley received a much-anticipated memo from the Office of Professional Responsibility, informing him that the Martin Luther King Task Force had had completed its investigation.

The Task Force had been formed the year prior, in response to the fallout from a Congressional hearing that had revealed the extent of the Bureau’s domestic surveillance, particularly in regards to civil rights leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The revelations had been so damning, in fact, that they had cast doubts on the integrity of the FBI’s investigation into King’s murder and added credence to the theories that the Bureau was somehow responsible.

Disproving the latter was the Task Force’s primary concern, so the bulk of the report involved reviewing the case files for evidence that the FBI had, though action or inaction, aided or abetted James Earl Ray.

While the report found that the investigation had been hampered by a lack of coordination between the FBI, the Attorney General’s Office, and the Memphis Police, there was no evidence that the Bureau had done anything to sabotage the investigation, and had indeed pursued things within the full extent of its abilities.

But rather than exonerating the FBI, it was in evaluating those abilities that the Task Force uncovered its most damning findings. The second, shorter, and much more incendiary part of the report covers the extent of the Bureau’s “surveillance and harassment” of King at the behest of J. Edgar Hoover.

The Task Force found the investigation eventually became something of a personal vendetta for Hoover …

with certain CONTELPRO elements - such as the infamous suicide letter - blatant civil rights violations.

The Task Force was so worried about the extent of this extralegal surveillance becoming public, either through King’s relatives or even worse, FOIA requesters, that they recommended the evidence sealed and destroyed as quickly as possible.

The report closes on the strong recommendation that, in order to avoid risking the loss of the public’s faith in institution, the FBI never again overstep its bounds and engage in this kind of illicit, illegal behavior.
Go here to read the actual documents.

Will he be airbrushed out of history?

At Ace of Spades JJ Sefton has this to say about Martin Luther King Jr.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. whose message of content of character over color of skin now flies directly in the face of mainstream (if you can call it that) Leftist ideology of "diversity," "multiculturalism" and the demonization of the American ideal of a meritocracy that it's only a matter of time before he, too, is airbrushed out of history and all the streets named after him get the Confederate general and Columbus treatment. How's that for sick irony?

Saturday, May 20, 2017

Insanity and Inhumanity

Guest post
2017-05-19
by Suzann Darnall

I really feel right now that some in the population of this country (and possibly the entire world) are suffering from a kind of insanity that causes them to behave with depraved inhumanity towards others. I truly cannot see another reason for the kinds of stupidity and cupidity they are perpetrating in their supposed beliefs. There are some truly mean and evil happenings going on right now in the name of politics, religion, environment, society, or whatever is at the top of someone’s priorities. The sad thing is that people seem to be way down on the list of so many special interest groups. In many areas even animals rate higher than humans.

There are numerous organizations that seem to be geared for doing nothing more than denying freedom to those with whom they disagree. Usually the freedom they are denying others is pretty much the same freedom they are demanding for themselves. Kinda weird and sorta scary.

One thing that I find especially distressing in all of this is the resurgence of racism. A particularly hateful kind of racism that is requiring segregation. Even more frightening is that this segregation is being demanded on college campuses. By students. And, it is seemingly being allowed by some administrations.

Gender bias is also becoming more prevalent and again the rebirth place seems to be centered around universities. But, this seems to be more widespread with their being both groups of students and educators indulging in this hateful practice. While some administrations are standing up against the bias, others are acquiescing to the demands of those who would be intolerant.
I lived in Alabama in the 1960s. I know about the rules that blacks lived under during that time. I also lived in Alabama in the 1970s and again in 1980. I saw the changes that happened in less than 20 years. My husband and I ate dinner in a private restaurant in 1980 with about two dozen people, including a mixed race couple and a black couple. What made this astonishing is that back in the 1960s this establishment would not have allowed any black people to enter as guests.

I also experienced gender bias when applying to the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) in the mid-1970s. In 1974 and early 1975 they pretty much would not even speak to female high school students ‘cause they were still not decided about allowing female cadets. In 1976, even after they had decided to allow females in, they still jury-rigged it so females wanting to fly were essentially penalized and kept out. Now, in 2017, not only is USAFA getting its SECOND female commandant, she is married and will be joined by her wife and their two children in Colorado Springs. Also, she is a USAFA graduate and an Air Force pilot. Two things denied to some of us just over 40 years earlier.


So, when I see some of the prejudices that had faded somewhat being brought again to life, I have to ask myself why anyone would want to resurrect such hate? No matter that much of it is reversed from the earlier times. No matter that it is now whites being denied entrance or men being discriminated against. Bigotry is wrong. Equality is not gained by one group denying freedom or rights to another group.

Segregation never was equality. Inequality never will be true freedom. A wise man, Martin Luther King, Jr., knew this and told it to all of us back in 1963. He was very inclusive. Inclusive of others. Despite race, gender, and religion. Maybe not in spite of those differences. Perhaps even because of the differences.

Do we really want to set back the clock to a time when such a man as MLK, Jr. was denied equality based on the color of his skin and not the content of his character? If we are now allowing those who preach such hate as gender bias and racial segregation, that is exactly the time we are heading towards at breakneck speed. How can such backwards thinking be anything except insane and inhumane???


Sayonara,
Suzann
http://www.suziezoo.com
http://www.woolymammoth.org

Monday, March 23, 2015

My one encounter with Saul Alinsky

I think it is time to write another post in defense of Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky was a hero of mine for a time in the 1960s. First, some background.

I came of age in the 1960s. Just as it was in 2008, change was in the air all throughout the 1960s. Young Americans wanted to be involved in changing things. Folk singers like Peter, Paul and Mary, Pete Seeger, Joan Baez, and Bob Dylan inspired us. The assassination of JFK rocked us. Some of us wanted to overcome against racial discrimination. Some of us wanted to stop communism. Some just wanted to give the middle finger to the establishment, smoke pot, have sex, and run to Canada to avoid the draft.

I was raised in a conservative Republican family whose hero was Dwight David Eisenhower. Growing up in Iowa my family had great respect for the farmers who grew things. I knew no blacks, but my hero was a black basketball player. Dwight Eisenhower brought to our attention the fact that there was discrimination against blacks. It was he, remember, who sent troops into Arkansas to make sure that black children could go to Little Rock High School.

I won an athletic scholarship to attend Hardin-Simmons University in Abilene, Texas. It was a school operated by the Southern Baptist Convention. I had been raised in the Methodist church. My dad was an usher. It was a very conservative, somber place where we attended every Sunday. When I got to Texas, I started to attend Baptist churches. I was amazed at the joyous singing. People really seemed to love Jesus Christ and want to follow Him. I did, too. I was baptized and immersed myself in learning about the Bible and Jesus. I took Koine Greek, the language of the New Testament, as my foreign language.

To be a follower of Christ is to be radicalized. You get a different set of values. You become interested in serving others. You know a joy that permeates your life. You see things that are wrong, and you want to change them. You ask questions. One of Saul Alinsky's trademark ideas is a question mark turned upside down into a plowshare that upends settled soil. Why are there no blacks in our churches, I asked. Why are there no blacks on the basketball team? Why are there separate drinking fountains?

I enrolled in Army ROTC and completed my first two years. When my mom found out I wanted to take the advance courses in my junior and senior years, she, unbeknownst to me, contacted our family pediatrician who had treated me for severe allergies as a child. He wrote a letter to the draft board, and I was classified 4F, making me ineligible for the draft. I continued on to graduate with a B.A. degree in psychology, with a minor in history. I was elected President of the Baptist Student Union and won an award at graduation as the outstanding male graduate.

My first job out of college was as a caseworker in a child welfare department. At night I would watch the national news on television. Two topics dominated the national news, Viet Nam, and Civil Rights. Although Walter Cronkite is remembered as America's anchorman, my favorites were Chet Huntley and David Brinkley. I particularly liked Brinkley's sense of humor. However, at coffee the next morning if I would mention something I saw the night before on the Huntley-Brinkley Report, my supervisors would caution me not to watch "Frontley-Pinkley." (Frontley stood for "Communist front", and Pinkley also stood for Communist).

Then, there was the stunning assassination of JFK in Dallas. The Dallas Morning News reported that some Texans actually celebrated. I wanted out. I made plans to go to graduate school at The University of Kansas, a nice kind of halfway point compromise between Iowa and Texas.

As I began my studies to earn a Masters degree in Social Work, I learned that in that profession there were three pathways of emphasis. One was working with individual clients as a kind of junior psychiatrist. Another was to work with groups of clients. A third was community organizing. I didn't see myself as a junior psychiatrist, so I gravitated toward the groupwork and community organizing pathways.

During my second year I had a field placement at an elementary school. The principal referred to me every student who was considered by him to be a behavior problem. Instead of working one-on-one with the students, I worked with them as a group, and also with their parents. We put on a play for the school on Abe Lincoln's birthday. The baddest, biggest, blackest kid in the school was Abe Lincoln. Later in the year, a girl in the group won the school spelling bee. None of the kids' parents had ever been involved with the school, but they did begin to get involved.

After earning my Master of Social Work degree, my first job was Director of a counseling center in the Kansas City, Kansas ghetto. The funding came from LBJ's War on Poverty. My office was located in a Lutheran Church, then later in a Catholic school. The civil rights movement was in full sway. While Martin Luther King led the movement in the South, Saul Alinsky did so in the North, from Rochester, New York to Chicago, to Kansas City, to California.

Martin Luther King was assassinated. The ghettoes erupted in violence. Non-violence gave way to Black Power. On the one year anniversary of King's assassination, my wife and I crossed the bridge over to Kansas City, Missouri to go out to dinner. A police car pulled us over. We waited for a long time for the officer to get out of his car. When he finally did, he informed me that he would have to take me to the jail and book me. I asked why? He said because I had accumulated a ton of parking tickets. I told him that was not true. Then I remembered: I had cosigned for a black teen to purchase a car. The car was in my name. The boy was the son of one of my workers at the counseling center.

This was the second and last time in my life I was booked into a jail. The first time was when one day in high school a kid named Mohammed Sadden had greeted me one morning and informed me that my girlfriend was a "slut." I swung at him and we scuffled for a while before agreeing to meet each other across the street on the lawn of the Lutheran Church after school. We did, along with most of the spectating student body, and the cops were called, after about 20 minutes of our brawl.

Back to Kansas City. After being booked into jail, I was put in a "bullpen," with about fifteen other guys. A cop brought in an inebriated black man, then wound up and punched the man as hard as he could right in the gut. I asked another officer if it was true that a person could get one phone call. He said yes. I called a Methodist minister who I knew was counseling Chief of Police Kelly on how to deal with groups like the Black Panthers. He called the Chief, I was released, and the cop who slugged the inebriated black man was fired a few days later.

The Methodist minister was one of a coalition of Christian ministers who had invited Saul Alinsky to come to Kansas City. One of the main reasons was to help the community deal with incidents of police brutality. Word got out about my experience witnessing police brutality, and the man himself, Saul Alinsky, wanted to meet me. I invited him to my house for dinner, spent a very enjoyable evening talking with him, and drove him back to his hotel.

Saul Alinsky was all about the least of these, the discriminated against, the ones Jesus wanted to reach. Alinsky was about empowering people, getting them to stand up for themselves. Unlike Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who studied Alinsky's tactics and used them to promote themselves and their own agendas, Alinsky was about empowering poor people. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have used Alinsky's tactics to make Republicans the enemy. Alinsky would come into a community, find out who was most hated, such as a Chief of Police, a Superintendent of Schools, a County Commissioner, and then purposely make himself the enemy of that hated person, thereby gaining the trust of the people he was trying to organize. Invariably, he was invited by coalitions of Christians; Catholics and protestants united, unlike Obama's promotion of ties with Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian mullahs. Alinsky died a few years after my one evening with him, and that was my last and only contact with him.

Often I read various conservative pundits writing about Alinsky. They make him out to be evil. He was not. He was a man who loved and stood with and for the least of these, the exploited and the discriminated against. Because Obama and Hillary studied his tactics and used them to promote their own rises to power, Alinsky is considered guilty by association. It isn't fair.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Color of skin, or content of character?

Roger Clegg writes that
It’s felicitous that two days after Martin Luther King Day this year, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project. This case involves the “disparate impact” approach to civil-rights enforcement, and that approach is contrary to Dr. King’s famous dream of a day when Americans would be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.

Suppose that the owner of an apartment complex decides that she does not want to rent units to people with recent convictions for violent crimes. She makes this decision for obvious reasons, namely that such criminals are unreliable tenants and that their presence makes it harder to rent other units and more likely that current tenants will decide to leave. She does not adopt this policy because she thinks it will disproportionately exclude members of this or that racial or ethnic group — indeed, she is completely unaware of what demographic impact it will have — and she applies it evenhandedly, without regard to skin color or national origin. What’s more, she can prove all this in court.

Can she nonetheless be liable for racial discrimination if her policy turns out to exclude members of some racial groups more frequently than members of other racial groups?

The Obama administration says yes — and the Supreme Court will determine in the Texas case if that’s right.

The Obama administration has made no secret of its love for this approach to civil-rights enforcement, and it has been aggressive in applying it to every imaginable situation. In employment, for example, it complains if a fire or police department administers physical or written tests that have politically incorrect results, or if a company uses criminal background checks; in voting, it objects if voter ID is required; in education, it is hostile to school discipline policies if they have a disproportionate racial or ethnic result; it has even insisted on drawing distinctions between acceptable and unacceptable pollution, depending on the skin color and national origin of those affected by the pollution.
Read more here.