Sunday, April 21, 2013

Living up to his father's expectations

Who was Tamerlane, the namesake of the dead Muslim bomber in Boston? Read this history!

And, what do we do about the bomber's father, who named him after this Islamic murderer who died in 1405?

It appears that this man's sons lived up to their father's expectations.

Update: Daniel Foster writes in National Review

This is speculative, but if early reports are borne out, we’ll see a portrait emerge of a dominant, pathological, and increasingly ideological older man who was the lead plotter and who had enlisted younger men as his accomplices and then wielded considerable psychological power over them. Here we see the murderous and perverted father-son dynamic of John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo, who in the fall of 2002 terrorized Washington, D.C., with a sniper rifle. That duo was a putrid mix of ideology, psychopathy, evil, and manipulation, and it would hardly be surprising if the full facts in the Tsarnaevs’ case reveal something much the same.

Foster examines many aspects of what is known and not known about the Boston bombers, and concludes,

The desire to read one’s political biases into acts of violence is unfortunate and, unfortunately, bipartisan. But if there is any little thing to be thankful for about the case of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar, it’s that it defies easy classification. Those who try to tell a simple story about who they were or why they resorted to terrorism will end up like the six blind men and the elephant: each partially in the right, and all in the wrong.

Read Foster's post here:

No comments:

Post a Comment