Climate Change = National Security?

Elizabeth Price Foley writes at Instapundit,

...the liberal/progressive forces are gearing up to scare LIVs (Low Information Voters) into believing global warming climate change is a national security risk.

So now, if one rejects massive economic reorganization based upon ever-changing evidence of cyclical, fluctuating global temperatures, one is not merely a “science denier,” but also putting U.S. national security at risk. Ironic, given that this accusation is coming from the same people who are so intimidated by ISIS that they dare not insult Mohammed, and think that talking about “radical Islam” is discriminatory because hey, as President Obama said, “Islam is a religion of peace.” But global warming climate change!– now that’s a real security risk!

These radical climatists don’t want to hear about contrary evidence, of which there is plenty. And indeed, if someone dares to publicly disagree with the progressive orthodoxy on global warming climate change, he is likely to be branded a heretic.

I hope the Republican candidates for President are readying themselves to punch back twice as hard when the mainstream media and Queen Hillary hit them with this “national security” accusation.

Instapundit Commenter Libby2 adds,

Seems the only war Obama won't engage in is one with America's enemies.

I'm sure ISIS/AQ/Taliban/Boko Haram, Iran, and Russia are thrilled we'll be diverting more money toward an imaginary foe instead of focusing on them.

Read more here.